TY - JOUR
T1 - A guide to CNN-based dense segmentation of neuronal em images
AU - Urakubo, Hidetoshi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Society of Microscopy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site-for further information please contact [email protected].
PY - 2025/6/1
Y1 - 2025/6/1
N2 - Large-scale reconstitution of neuronal circuits from volumetric electron microscopy images is a remarkable research goal in neuroanatomy. However, the large-scale reconstruction is a result of automatic segmentation using convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which is still challenging for general researchers to perform. This review focuses on two representative CNNs for dense neuronal segmentation: flood-filling networks (FFNs) and local shape descriptors (LSDs)-predicting U-Net (LSD network). It outlines their basic mechanisms, requirements, and output segmentation using the author's example segmentation. The FFN excels in segmenting long axons, and the LSD network is adept at segmenting myelinated axons. The choice between FFN and LSD depends on the target, as neither is universally superior. A common limitation of FFN and LSD is the easy detachment of thin spines from parent dendrites, which is fundamentally unavoidable. The author also introduces CNNs that were proposed to mitigate this issue. As CNN-based automated segmentation can take months, researchers need to be aware of the selection of an appropriate CNN, required computer resources and fundamental limitations. This review serves as a guide for such dense neuronal segmentation.
AB - Large-scale reconstitution of neuronal circuits from volumetric electron microscopy images is a remarkable research goal in neuroanatomy. However, the large-scale reconstruction is a result of automatic segmentation using convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which is still challenging for general researchers to perform. This review focuses on two representative CNNs for dense neuronal segmentation: flood-filling networks (FFNs) and local shape descriptors (LSDs)-predicting U-Net (LSD network). It outlines their basic mechanisms, requirements, and output segmentation using the author's example segmentation. The FFN excels in segmenting long axons, and the LSD network is adept at segmenting myelinated axons. The choice between FFN and LSD depends on the target, as neither is universally superior. A common limitation of FFN and LSD is the easy detachment of thin spines from parent dendrites, which is fundamentally unavoidable. The author also introduces CNNs that were proposed to mitigate this issue. As CNN-based automated segmentation can take months, researchers need to be aware of the selection of an appropriate CNN, required computer resources and fundamental limitations. This review serves as a guide for such dense neuronal segmentation.
KW - convolutional neural network
KW - electron microscopy
KW - flood-filling networks
KW - image segmentation
KW - local shape descriptors
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105009648746
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105009648746#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1093/jmicro/dfaf002
DO - 10.1093/jmicro/dfaf002
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39801292
AN - SCOPUS:105009648746
SN - 2050-5698
VL - 74
SP - 223
EP - 232
JO - Microscopy
JF - Microscopy
IS - 3
ER -