A study of salivary gland aspiration cytology reporting: Guideline validity

Norihiko Murai, Zenchi Taniguchi, Yuka Takahashi, Yumiko Yasuhara, Fumiko Kuboshima, Ichiro Tateya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)


We retrospectively reviewed 44 cases of major salivary gland lesions surgically resected following preoperative fineneedle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Our objective was to determine the validity of the salivary gland FNAC reporting proposed in 2004 by the Japanese Society of Clinical Cytology. Of the 44 lesions, 33 were in the parotid gland and 11 in the submandibular gland. Of these, 8 lesions were malignant. Two from benign lesions could not be satisfactorily evaluated, and 4 from benign lesions and 1 from a malignant lesion were indeterminate. Results were 3 true positive, 30 true negative, and 4 false negative, with no false positive results. Calculated sensitivity was 42.9% (4/7), specificity 100% (30/30), and accuracy 89.2% (34/37). We concluded that using the new reporting decreases ambiguity in clinicians' interpretation of cytology reports, thus benefitting subjects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)615-619
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Otolaryngology of Japan
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 07-2011
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology


Dive into the research topics of 'A study of salivary gland aspiration cytology reporting: Guideline validity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this