An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes of radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: The need for further minimally invasive treatment

  • Satoshi Tamauchi
  • , Shohei Iyoshi
  • , Masato Yoshihara
  • , Kosuke Yoshida
  • , Yoshiki Ikeda
  • , Yusuke Shimizu
  • , Akira Yokoi
  • , Kaoru Niimi
  • , Nobuhisa Yoshikawa
  • , Hiroaki Kajiyama

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the oncologic and obstetric outcomes of radical trachelectomy (RT) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer and to evaluate the potential role of fertility-preserving treatments in improving pregnancy outcomes while oncologic status is stable. Methods: In this single-institution study, we analyzed the oncologic and obstetric outcomes of 67 patients with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent RT at Nagoya University Hospital. Results: The cancer recurrence rate (6.0%) and the mortality rate (1.5%) were comparable with those of previous studies. Of the 46 patients who attempted to conceive after RT, 19 (41.3%) became pregnant, and 16 gave birth. Of these 37.5% delivered at term, and delivery at less than 28 weeks of gestation occurred in 31.3% of pregnancies. Conclusions: RT is a viable treatment option for selected patients with early-stage cervical cancer. However, the use of less invasive techniques, such as conization/simple trachelectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection, may improve pregnancy outcomes while oncologic status is stable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-181
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
Volume50
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 02-2024
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An update of oncologic and obstetric outcomes of radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: The need for further minimally invasive treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this