Attitudes towards terminal care among the general population and medical practitioners in Japan

M. Miyashita, Shuji Hashimoto, M. Kawa, M. Kojima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Assessment of attitudes held by the general population and medical practitioners in Japan regarding medical interventions in cases of painful terminal illness or a prolonged vegetative state. METHOD: A mail survey was conducted in 1998. The subjects were 5,000 persons randomly sampled members of the general population age 20 years or more, and 3,104 doctors and 6,059 nurses in hospitals, clinics, palliative units, and visiting nursing service stations randomly sampled. The response rates were 48% among general population, 51% among doctors, 56% among nurses. RESULTS: 1. 68-76% of the general population and medical practitioners expressed disapproval of life-extending medical treatment of terminal patients suffering pain. The application of euthanasia in certain cases was acceptable to 13% of the general population but only 1% of the medical practitioners. 2. Respondents in almost groups favored a home care setting for terminal patient in pain, and regarded relocation to a palliative unit as acceptable if necessary. 3. 46% of doctors and 22% of nurses indicated knowledge of the WHO method for cancer pain relief, and 45% of doctors and 25% of nurses showed that they were able to explain appropriate opioid administration. 4. 74-79% of general population and medical practitioners opposed life-extending medical intervention for patients in a vegetable state. 26% of the general population favored termination of all means of life support, while about 10% of the medical practitioners held this view. 5. Most medical practitioners felt that some medical treatments, such as bedsore care, should be continued in lieu of life support, but there were differences in opinion between practitioners at various types of medical facilities regarding the necessity of such specific measures as, for example, blood pressure monitoring by automatic sphygmomanometer among the medical facilities. CONCLUSION: Both the general population and the medical practitioners in Japan tended to oppose life-extending medical treatment for painful terminal cases and patients in a prolonged vegetable state. There are some differences in opinion between the general population and practitioners at various types of medical facilities regarding the extent of desirable medical care in such circumstances.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)391-401
Number of pages11
Journal[Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health
Volume46
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Terminal Care
Japan
Population
Nurses
Vegetables
Nursing Stations
Sphygmomanometers
Persistent Vegetative State
Pain
Nursing Services
Euthanasia
Pressure Ulcer
Postal Service
Home Care Services
General Practitioners
Opioid Analgesics
Therapeutics
Blood Pressure

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{a8df0d729f1a4fb3bec72b29bb454390,
title = "Attitudes towards terminal care among the general population and medical practitioners in Japan",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Assessment of attitudes held by the general population and medical practitioners in Japan regarding medical interventions in cases of painful terminal illness or a prolonged vegetative state. METHOD: A mail survey was conducted in 1998. The subjects were 5,000 persons randomly sampled members of the general population age 20 years or more, and 3,104 doctors and 6,059 nurses in hospitals, clinics, palliative units, and visiting nursing service stations randomly sampled. The response rates were 48{\%} among general population, 51{\%} among doctors, 56{\%} among nurses. RESULTS: 1. 68-76{\%} of the general population and medical practitioners expressed disapproval of life-extending medical treatment of terminal patients suffering pain. The application of euthanasia in certain cases was acceptable to 13{\%} of the general population but only 1{\%} of the medical practitioners. 2. Respondents in almost groups favored a home care setting for terminal patient in pain, and regarded relocation to a palliative unit as acceptable if necessary. 3. 46{\%} of doctors and 22{\%} of nurses indicated knowledge of the WHO method for cancer pain relief, and 45{\%} of doctors and 25{\%} of nurses showed that they were able to explain appropriate opioid administration. 4. 74-79{\%} of general population and medical practitioners opposed life-extending medical intervention for patients in a vegetable state. 26{\%} of the general population favored termination of all means of life support, while about 10{\%} of the medical practitioners held this view. 5. Most medical practitioners felt that some medical treatments, such as bedsore care, should be continued in lieu of life support, but there were differences in opinion between practitioners at various types of medical facilities regarding the necessity of such specific measures as, for example, blood pressure monitoring by automatic sphygmomanometer among the medical facilities. CONCLUSION: Both the general population and the medical practitioners in Japan tended to oppose life-extending medical treatment for painful terminal cases and patients in a prolonged vegetable state. There are some differences in opinion between the general population and practitioners at various types of medical facilities regarding the extent of desirable medical care in such circumstances.",
author = "M. Miyashita and Shuji Hashimoto and M. Kawa and M. Kojima",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "391--401",
journal = "[Nippon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health",
issn = "0546-1766",
publisher = "Nihon Eisei Gammai/Japanese Society of Public Health",
number = "5",

}

Attitudes towards terminal care among the general population and medical practitioners in Japan. / Miyashita, M.; Hashimoto, Shuji; Kawa, M.; Kojima, M.

In: [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health, Vol. 46, No. 5, 01.01.1999, p. 391-401.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attitudes towards terminal care among the general population and medical practitioners in Japan

AU - Miyashita, M.

AU - Hashimoto, Shuji

AU - Kawa, M.

AU - Kojima, M.

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Assessment of attitudes held by the general population and medical practitioners in Japan regarding medical interventions in cases of painful terminal illness or a prolonged vegetative state. METHOD: A mail survey was conducted in 1998. The subjects were 5,000 persons randomly sampled members of the general population age 20 years or more, and 3,104 doctors and 6,059 nurses in hospitals, clinics, palliative units, and visiting nursing service stations randomly sampled. The response rates were 48% among general population, 51% among doctors, 56% among nurses. RESULTS: 1. 68-76% of the general population and medical practitioners expressed disapproval of life-extending medical treatment of terminal patients suffering pain. The application of euthanasia in certain cases was acceptable to 13% of the general population but only 1% of the medical practitioners. 2. Respondents in almost groups favored a home care setting for terminal patient in pain, and regarded relocation to a palliative unit as acceptable if necessary. 3. 46% of doctors and 22% of nurses indicated knowledge of the WHO method for cancer pain relief, and 45% of doctors and 25% of nurses showed that they were able to explain appropriate opioid administration. 4. 74-79% of general population and medical practitioners opposed life-extending medical intervention for patients in a vegetable state. 26% of the general population favored termination of all means of life support, while about 10% of the medical practitioners held this view. 5. Most medical practitioners felt that some medical treatments, such as bedsore care, should be continued in lieu of life support, but there were differences in opinion between practitioners at various types of medical facilities regarding the necessity of such specific measures as, for example, blood pressure monitoring by automatic sphygmomanometer among the medical facilities. CONCLUSION: Both the general population and the medical practitioners in Japan tended to oppose life-extending medical treatment for painful terminal cases and patients in a prolonged vegetable state. There are some differences in opinion between the general population and practitioners at various types of medical facilities regarding the extent of desirable medical care in such circumstances.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Assessment of attitudes held by the general population and medical practitioners in Japan regarding medical interventions in cases of painful terminal illness or a prolonged vegetative state. METHOD: A mail survey was conducted in 1998. The subjects were 5,000 persons randomly sampled members of the general population age 20 years or more, and 3,104 doctors and 6,059 nurses in hospitals, clinics, palliative units, and visiting nursing service stations randomly sampled. The response rates were 48% among general population, 51% among doctors, 56% among nurses. RESULTS: 1. 68-76% of the general population and medical practitioners expressed disapproval of life-extending medical treatment of terminal patients suffering pain. The application of euthanasia in certain cases was acceptable to 13% of the general population but only 1% of the medical practitioners. 2. Respondents in almost groups favored a home care setting for terminal patient in pain, and regarded relocation to a palliative unit as acceptable if necessary. 3. 46% of doctors and 22% of nurses indicated knowledge of the WHO method for cancer pain relief, and 45% of doctors and 25% of nurses showed that they were able to explain appropriate opioid administration. 4. 74-79% of general population and medical practitioners opposed life-extending medical intervention for patients in a vegetable state. 26% of the general population favored termination of all means of life support, while about 10% of the medical practitioners held this view. 5. Most medical practitioners felt that some medical treatments, such as bedsore care, should be continued in lieu of life support, but there were differences in opinion between practitioners at various types of medical facilities regarding the necessity of such specific measures as, for example, blood pressure monitoring by automatic sphygmomanometer among the medical facilities. CONCLUSION: Both the general population and the medical practitioners in Japan tended to oppose life-extending medical treatment for painful terminal cases and patients in a prolonged vegetable state. There are some differences in opinion between the general population and practitioners at various types of medical facilities regarding the extent of desirable medical care in such circumstances.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033129038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033129038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10483132

AN - SCOPUS:0033129038

VL - 46

SP - 391

EP - 401

JO - [Nippon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health

JF - [Nippon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health

SN - 0546-1766

IS - 5

ER -