Biventricular pacing has an advantage over left ventricular epicardial pacing alone to minimize proarrhythmic perturbation of repolarization

Masahide Harada, Toshiyuki Osaka, Eriko Yokoyama, Yoshio Takemoto, Atsushi Ito, Itsuo Kodama

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by simultaneous biventricular pacing is now widely accepted as a new therapeutic option for patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF). Recent studies have shown comparable hemodynamic benefits of left ventricular (LV) pacing alone. The clinical usefulness of CRT, however, might be compromised by potential exaggeration of arrhythmogenic substrates through a modification of ventricular repolarization. Methods and Results: We compared ECG parameters during sinus rhythm (SR), atrioventricular synchronous pacing at the right ventricular apex (RVendP), at LV epicardium (LVepiP), and at both sites (BiVP) in acute homodynamic studies of 14 CHF patients scheduled for CRT (QRS duration = 144 ± 23 msec, LVEF = 27 ± 10%). The maximum rate of increase in LV pressure (LVdp/dtmax) was decreased significantly during RVendP, whereas it was increased similarly during LVepiP and BiVP compared with SR. QTc was increased during RVendP (by 10.2%) and LV epiP (by 26.1%). QTc dispersion (QTcmax-QTcmin in the six precordial leads) was also increased during LVepiP (by 66.5%). These parameters were unaffected during BiVP. JTc was unchanged, and the interval from the peak to the end of the T wave (Tcpeak-end) was increased slightly (by 19.3%) during RVendP. Both JTc and Tc peak-end were increased dramatically during LVepiP (by 18.2% and 55.4%, respectively), but increased only modestly during BiVP (by 6.6% and 15.8%, respectively). Conclusions: LVepiP causes much greater increase in spatial dispersion of ventricular repolarization than BiVP in CHF patients. BiVP may have a substantial advantage over LVepiP to minimize the proarrhythmic perturbation of ventricular repolarization in association with CRT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-156
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-02-2006

Fingerprint

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Heart Failure
Pericardium
Ventricular Pressure
Electrocardiography
Hemodynamics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Harada, Masahide ; Osaka, Toshiyuki ; Yokoyama, Eriko ; Takemoto, Yoshio ; Ito, Atsushi ; Kodama, Itsuo. / Biventricular pacing has an advantage over left ventricular epicardial pacing alone to minimize proarrhythmic perturbation of repolarization. In: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2006 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 151-156.
@article{f2fd3d14161e4b86bf8c9b123d7d9d38,
title = "Biventricular pacing has an advantage over left ventricular epicardial pacing alone to minimize proarrhythmic perturbation of repolarization",
abstract = "Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by simultaneous biventricular pacing is now widely accepted as a new therapeutic option for patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF). Recent studies have shown comparable hemodynamic benefits of left ventricular (LV) pacing alone. The clinical usefulness of CRT, however, might be compromised by potential exaggeration of arrhythmogenic substrates through a modification of ventricular repolarization. Methods and Results: We compared ECG parameters during sinus rhythm (SR), atrioventricular synchronous pacing at the right ventricular apex (RVendP), at LV epicardium (LVepiP), and at both sites (BiVP) in acute homodynamic studies of 14 CHF patients scheduled for CRT (QRS duration = 144 ± 23 msec, LVEF = 27 ± 10{\%}). The maximum rate of increase in LV pressure (LVdp/dtmax) was decreased significantly during RVendP, whereas it was increased similarly during LVepiP and BiVP compared with SR. QTc was increased during RVendP (by 10.2{\%}) and LV epiP (by 26.1{\%}). QTc dispersion (QTcmax-QTcmin in the six precordial leads) was also increased during LVepiP (by 66.5{\%}). These parameters were unaffected during BiVP. JTc was unchanged, and the interval from the peak to the end of the T wave (Tcpeak-end) was increased slightly (by 19.3{\%}) during RVendP. Both JTc and Tc peak-end were increased dramatically during LVepiP (by 18.2{\%} and 55.4{\%}, respectively), but increased only modestly during BiVP (by 6.6{\%} and 15.8{\%}, respectively). Conclusions: LVepiP causes much greater increase in spatial dispersion of ventricular repolarization than BiVP in CHF patients. BiVP may have a substantial advantage over LVepiP to minimize the proarrhythmic perturbation of ventricular repolarization in association with CRT.",
author = "Masahide Harada and Toshiyuki Osaka and Eriko Yokoyama and Yoshio Takemoto and Atsushi Ito and Itsuo Kodama",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.00310.x",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "151--156",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology",
issn = "1045-3873",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Biventricular pacing has an advantage over left ventricular epicardial pacing alone to minimize proarrhythmic perturbation of repolarization. / Harada, Masahide; Osaka, Toshiyuki; Yokoyama, Eriko; Takemoto, Yoshio; Ito, Atsushi; Kodama, Itsuo.

In: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.02.2006, p. 151-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biventricular pacing has an advantage over left ventricular epicardial pacing alone to minimize proarrhythmic perturbation of repolarization

AU - Harada, Masahide

AU - Osaka, Toshiyuki

AU - Yokoyama, Eriko

AU - Takemoto, Yoshio

AU - Ito, Atsushi

AU - Kodama, Itsuo

PY - 2006/2/1

Y1 - 2006/2/1

N2 - Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by simultaneous biventricular pacing is now widely accepted as a new therapeutic option for patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF). Recent studies have shown comparable hemodynamic benefits of left ventricular (LV) pacing alone. The clinical usefulness of CRT, however, might be compromised by potential exaggeration of arrhythmogenic substrates through a modification of ventricular repolarization. Methods and Results: We compared ECG parameters during sinus rhythm (SR), atrioventricular synchronous pacing at the right ventricular apex (RVendP), at LV epicardium (LVepiP), and at both sites (BiVP) in acute homodynamic studies of 14 CHF patients scheduled for CRT (QRS duration = 144 ± 23 msec, LVEF = 27 ± 10%). The maximum rate of increase in LV pressure (LVdp/dtmax) was decreased significantly during RVendP, whereas it was increased similarly during LVepiP and BiVP compared with SR. QTc was increased during RVendP (by 10.2%) and LV epiP (by 26.1%). QTc dispersion (QTcmax-QTcmin in the six precordial leads) was also increased during LVepiP (by 66.5%). These parameters were unaffected during BiVP. JTc was unchanged, and the interval from the peak to the end of the T wave (Tcpeak-end) was increased slightly (by 19.3%) during RVendP. Both JTc and Tc peak-end were increased dramatically during LVepiP (by 18.2% and 55.4%, respectively), but increased only modestly during BiVP (by 6.6% and 15.8%, respectively). Conclusions: LVepiP causes much greater increase in spatial dispersion of ventricular repolarization than BiVP in CHF patients. BiVP may have a substantial advantage over LVepiP to minimize the proarrhythmic perturbation of ventricular repolarization in association with CRT.

AB - Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by simultaneous biventricular pacing is now widely accepted as a new therapeutic option for patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF). Recent studies have shown comparable hemodynamic benefits of left ventricular (LV) pacing alone. The clinical usefulness of CRT, however, might be compromised by potential exaggeration of arrhythmogenic substrates through a modification of ventricular repolarization. Methods and Results: We compared ECG parameters during sinus rhythm (SR), atrioventricular synchronous pacing at the right ventricular apex (RVendP), at LV epicardium (LVepiP), and at both sites (BiVP) in acute homodynamic studies of 14 CHF patients scheduled for CRT (QRS duration = 144 ± 23 msec, LVEF = 27 ± 10%). The maximum rate of increase in LV pressure (LVdp/dtmax) was decreased significantly during RVendP, whereas it was increased similarly during LVepiP and BiVP compared with SR. QTc was increased during RVendP (by 10.2%) and LV epiP (by 26.1%). QTc dispersion (QTcmax-QTcmin in the six precordial leads) was also increased during LVepiP (by 66.5%). These parameters were unaffected during BiVP. JTc was unchanged, and the interval from the peak to the end of the T wave (Tcpeak-end) was increased slightly (by 19.3%) during RVendP. Both JTc and Tc peak-end were increased dramatically during LVepiP (by 18.2% and 55.4%, respectively), but increased only modestly during BiVP (by 6.6% and 15.8%, respectively). Conclusions: LVepiP causes much greater increase in spatial dispersion of ventricular repolarization than BiVP in CHF patients. BiVP may have a substantial advantage over LVepiP to minimize the proarrhythmic perturbation of ventricular repolarization in association with CRT.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644786315&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644786315&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.00310.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.00310.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 16533252

AN - SCOPUS:33644786315

VL - 17

SP - 151

EP - 156

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

SN - 1045-3873

IS - 2

ER -