TY - JOUR
T1 - Calculating the Tumor Nuclei Content for Comprehensive Cancer Panel Testing
AU - Mikubo, Masashi
AU - Seto, Katsutoshi
AU - Kitamura, Atsuko
AU - Nakaguro, Masato
AU - Hattori, Yukinori
AU - Maeda, Nagako
AU - Miyazaki, Tatsuhiko
AU - Watanabe, Kazuko
AU - Murakami, Hideki
AU - Tsukamoto, Tetsuya
AU - Yamada, Tetsuya
AU - Fujita, Shiro
AU - Masago, Katsuhiro
AU - Ramkissoon, Shakti
AU - Ross, Jeffrey S.
AU - Elvin, Julia
AU - Yatabe, Yasushi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
PY - 2020/1
Y1 - 2020/1
N2 - Comprehensive genetic panel testing generally requires that the analyzed tissues have a percent tumor nuclei (%TN) content of 20% or more to achieve assay performance comparable to the validated specifications. Pathologists play a crucial role in ensuring that the optimal results are achieved by accurately assigning %TN content of the available specimens and selecting the best material to submit for sequencing. This study addresses the issues in evaluating %TN, such as intraobserver variability, and examines whether focused training and feedback can improve pathologist performance. Nine referring institution pathologists (all board-certified and working at the core institute and the alignment hospitals under the National Cancer Genome scheme) evaluated 18 tumors that had been subjected to comprehensive genetic panel testing with the FoundationOne CDx assay. The %TN estimates provided by referring institution pathologists were compared with two standards: %TN assigned by the tumor sequencing institution's pathologist (a board-certified pathologist at Foundation Medicine, Inc.) and the computational %TN estimated from the mutant allele frequencies after sequencing was completed. The pathologists generally overestimated %TN in the first pretraining round of the evaluation, and the differences in the averaged %TN from the tumor sequencing institution and computational standards were statistically significant. However, the posttraining second-round results became significantly concordant with the standards. This study suggests that %TN content is empirically overestimated but the evaluation skill can be improved by providing a training and feedback program.
AB - Comprehensive genetic panel testing generally requires that the analyzed tissues have a percent tumor nuclei (%TN) content of 20% or more to achieve assay performance comparable to the validated specifications. Pathologists play a crucial role in ensuring that the optimal results are achieved by accurately assigning %TN content of the available specimens and selecting the best material to submit for sequencing. This study addresses the issues in evaluating %TN, such as intraobserver variability, and examines whether focused training and feedback can improve pathologist performance. Nine referring institution pathologists (all board-certified and working at the core institute and the alignment hospitals under the National Cancer Genome scheme) evaluated 18 tumors that had been subjected to comprehensive genetic panel testing with the FoundationOne CDx assay. The %TN estimates provided by referring institution pathologists were compared with two standards: %TN assigned by the tumor sequencing institution's pathologist (a board-certified pathologist at Foundation Medicine, Inc.) and the computational %TN estimated from the mutant allele frequencies after sequencing was completed. The pathologists generally overestimated %TN in the first pretraining round of the evaluation, and the differences in the averaged %TN from the tumor sequencing institution and computational standards were statistically significant. However, the posttraining second-round results became significantly concordant with the standards. This study suggests that %TN content is empirically overestimated but the evaluation skill can be improved by providing a training and feedback program.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075356217&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075356217&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.09.081
DO - 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.09.081
M3 - Article
C2 - 31605798
AN - SCOPUS:85075356217
SN - 1556-0864
VL - 15
SP - 130
EP - 137
JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
IS - 1
ER -