Can intracoronary ultrasound correctly assess the luminal dimensions of coronary artery lesions? A comparison with quantitative angiography

J. Haase, Yukio Ozaki, C. Di Mario, J. Escaned, P. J. De Feyter, J. R.T.C. Roelandt, P. W. Serruys

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 62 patients with angina pectoris Canadian Class III and IV, the luminal dimensions of 25 pre-PTCA and 56 post-PTCA lesions without occlusion were examined with a 4.3 F 30 MHz mechanical ultrasound imaging catheter, and analysed off-line using ultrasound cross-sectional area (U-CSA) measurements from s-VHS video images (n = 81). In addition, 42 angiographically normal coronary segments were examined. At the site of the examination, the U-CSA was integrated centrally to the leading edge echo of the inner contour of the vessel wall and the corresponding angiographic cinefilm images were analysed by edge detection using the Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System. The obstruction diameter (at the lesion) and the mean vessel diameter (at normal sites) were used to calculate the angiographically cross-sectional area (A-CSA) assuming a circular model. U-CSA values were compared with the corresponding A-CSA values using t-test and linear regression analysis. The study showed that larger CSA are measured with ultrasound than with angiography. (P < 0.0001). An acceptable correlation was found between U-CSA and A-CSA values in normal coronary segments (correlation coefficient: r = 0.73, mean diff. = 1.44 ± 1.22 mm2). However, the correlation was poor at the site of pre-PTCA lesions (r = 0.62, mean diff. = 1.81 ± 1.14 mm2) and deteriorated following PTCA (r = 0.47, mean diff. = 1.28 ± 2.20 mm2). No correlation was found between the degree of lumen eccentricity measured with ultracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) and the individual differences between U-CSA and A-CSA values. It was concluded that U-CSA at coronary lesions shows poor correlation with A-CSA. Basic methodological differences between the techniques may explain the overstimulation of cross-sectional areas by ICUS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)112-119
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Heart Journal
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Coronary Vessels
Angiography
Angina Pectoris
Individuality
Linear Models
Ultrasonography
Reference Values
Catheters
Regression Analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Haase, J. ; Ozaki, Yukio ; Di Mario, C. ; Escaned, J. ; De Feyter, P. J. ; Roelandt, J. R.T.C. ; Serruys, P. W. / Can intracoronary ultrasound correctly assess the luminal dimensions of coronary artery lesions? A comparison with quantitative angiography. In: European Heart Journal. 1995 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 112-119.
@article{e71106f93a3942468ce8612eb660c1f0,
title = "Can intracoronary ultrasound correctly assess the luminal dimensions of coronary artery lesions? A comparison with quantitative angiography",
abstract = "In 62 patients with angina pectoris Canadian Class III and IV, the luminal dimensions of 25 pre-PTCA and 56 post-PTCA lesions without occlusion were examined with a 4.3 F 30 MHz mechanical ultrasound imaging catheter, and analysed off-line using ultrasound cross-sectional area (U-CSA) measurements from s-VHS video images (n = 81). In addition, 42 angiographically normal coronary segments were examined. At the site of the examination, the U-CSA was integrated centrally to the leading edge echo of the inner contour of the vessel wall and the corresponding angiographic cinefilm images were analysed by edge detection using the Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System. The obstruction diameter (at the lesion) and the mean vessel diameter (at normal sites) were used to calculate the angiographically cross-sectional area (A-CSA) assuming a circular model. U-CSA values were compared with the corresponding A-CSA values using t-test and linear regression analysis. The study showed that larger CSA are measured with ultrasound than with angiography. (P < 0.0001). An acceptable correlation was found between U-CSA and A-CSA values in normal coronary segments (correlation coefficient: r = 0.73, mean diff. = 1.44 ± 1.22 mm2). However, the correlation was poor at the site of pre-PTCA lesions (r = 0.62, mean diff. = 1.81 ± 1.14 mm2) and deteriorated following PTCA (r = 0.47, mean diff. = 1.28 ± 2.20 mm2). No correlation was found between the degree of lumen eccentricity measured with ultracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) and the individual differences between U-CSA and A-CSA values. It was concluded that U-CSA at coronary lesions shows poor correlation with A-CSA. Basic methodological differences between the techniques may explain the overstimulation of cross-sectional areas by ICUS.",
author = "J. Haase and Yukio Ozaki and {Di Mario}, C. and J. Escaned and {De Feyter}, {P. J.} and Roelandt, {J. R.T.C.} and Serruys, {P. W.}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/eurheartj/16.1.112",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "112--119",
journal = "European Heart Journal",
issn = "0195-668X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Can intracoronary ultrasound correctly assess the luminal dimensions of coronary artery lesions? A comparison with quantitative angiography. / Haase, J.; Ozaki, Yukio; Di Mario, C.; Escaned, J.; De Feyter, P. J.; Roelandt, J. R.T.C.; Serruys, P. W.

In: European Heart Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.01.1995, p. 112-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can intracoronary ultrasound correctly assess the luminal dimensions of coronary artery lesions? A comparison with quantitative angiography

AU - Haase, J.

AU - Ozaki, Yukio

AU - Di Mario, C.

AU - Escaned, J.

AU - De Feyter, P. J.

AU - Roelandt, J. R.T.C.

AU - Serruys, P. W.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - In 62 patients with angina pectoris Canadian Class III and IV, the luminal dimensions of 25 pre-PTCA and 56 post-PTCA lesions without occlusion were examined with a 4.3 F 30 MHz mechanical ultrasound imaging catheter, and analysed off-line using ultrasound cross-sectional area (U-CSA) measurements from s-VHS video images (n = 81). In addition, 42 angiographically normal coronary segments were examined. At the site of the examination, the U-CSA was integrated centrally to the leading edge echo of the inner contour of the vessel wall and the corresponding angiographic cinefilm images were analysed by edge detection using the Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System. The obstruction diameter (at the lesion) and the mean vessel diameter (at normal sites) were used to calculate the angiographically cross-sectional area (A-CSA) assuming a circular model. U-CSA values were compared with the corresponding A-CSA values using t-test and linear regression analysis. The study showed that larger CSA are measured with ultrasound than with angiography. (P < 0.0001). An acceptable correlation was found between U-CSA and A-CSA values in normal coronary segments (correlation coefficient: r = 0.73, mean diff. = 1.44 ± 1.22 mm2). However, the correlation was poor at the site of pre-PTCA lesions (r = 0.62, mean diff. = 1.81 ± 1.14 mm2) and deteriorated following PTCA (r = 0.47, mean diff. = 1.28 ± 2.20 mm2). No correlation was found between the degree of lumen eccentricity measured with ultracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) and the individual differences between U-CSA and A-CSA values. It was concluded that U-CSA at coronary lesions shows poor correlation with A-CSA. Basic methodological differences between the techniques may explain the overstimulation of cross-sectional areas by ICUS.

AB - In 62 patients with angina pectoris Canadian Class III and IV, the luminal dimensions of 25 pre-PTCA and 56 post-PTCA lesions without occlusion were examined with a 4.3 F 30 MHz mechanical ultrasound imaging catheter, and analysed off-line using ultrasound cross-sectional area (U-CSA) measurements from s-VHS video images (n = 81). In addition, 42 angiographically normal coronary segments were examined. At the site of the examination, the U-CSA was integrated centrally to the leading edge echo of the inner contour of the vessel wall and the corresponding angiographic cinefilm images were analysed by edge detection using the Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System. The obstruction diameter (at the lesion) and the mean vessel diameter (at normal sites) were used to calculate the angiographically cross-sectional area (A-CSA) assuming a circular model. U-CSA values were compared with the corresponding A-CSA values using t-test and linear regression analysis. The study showed that larger CSA are measured with ultrasound than with angiography. (P < 0.0001). An acceptable correlation was found between U-CSA and A-CSA values in normal coronary segments (correlation coefficient: r = 0.73, mean diff. = 1.44 ± 1.22 mm2). However, the correlation was poor at the site of pre-PTCA lesions (r = 0.62, mean diff. = 1.81 ± 1.14 mm2) and deteriorated following PTCA (r = 0.47, mean diff. = 1.28 ± 2.20 mm2). No correlation was found between the degree of lumen eccentricity measured with ultracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) and the individual differences between U-CSA and A-CSA values. It was concluded that U-CSA at coronary lesions shows poor correlation with A-CSA. Basic methodological differences between the techniques may explain the overstimulation of cross-sectional areas by ICUS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028898306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028898306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/16.1.112

DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/16.1.112

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 112

EP - 119

JO - European Heart Journal

JF - European Heart Journal

SN - 0195-668X

IS - 1

ER -