Can smoking duration alone replace pack-years to predict the risk of smoking-related oncogenic mutations in non-small cell lung cancer? A cross-sectional study in Japan

  • Koichi Ogawa
  • , Yasuhiro Koh
  • , Hiroyasu Kaneda
  • , Motohiro Izumi
  • , Yoshiya Matsumoto
  • , Kenji Sawa
  • , Mitsuru Fukui
  • , Yoshihiko Taniguchi
  • , Naoki Yoshimoto
  • , Akihiro Tamiya
  • , Masahiko Ando
  • , Akihito Kubo
  • , Shun Ichi Isa
  • , Hideo Saka
  • , Akihide Matsumura
  • , Tomoya Kawaguchi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To investigate whether smoking duration alone can replace pack-years to predict the risk of oncogenic mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Design A cross-sectional study using the baseline dataset from the Japan Molecular Epidemiology for Lung Cancer Study. Setting Forty-three medical institutions nationwide in Japan. Participants From July 2012 to December 2013, 957 patients with newly diagnosed stage I-IIIB NSCLC who underwent surgery were enrolled, and molecular analyses were performed on 876 samples (from 441 ever-smokers and 435 never-smokers). Main outcomes measured We calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values using logistic regression to compare between the predictive values of smoking duration and pack-years for mutational frequencies in the v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS), tumour suppressor p53 (TP53), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genes and for cytosine-to-adenine base substitution (C>A). Results For predicting KRAS mutations, the AUC values for smoking duration and pack-years were 0.746 (95% CI 0.682 to 0.800) and 0.759 (95% CI 0.700 to 0.810), respectively (p=0.058). For predicting KRAS mutations in smokers, the AUC values for smoking duration and pack-years were 0.772 (95% CI 0.697 to 0.833) and 0.787 (95% CI 0.714 to 0.845), respectively (p=0.036). There were no significant differences between the AUC values for smoking duration and pack-years in terms of predicting TP53 and EGFR mutations and C>A. Pack-years was a significantly better predictor of KRAS mutations than smoking duration. Conclusion Smoking duration was not significantly different from pack-years in predicting the likelihood of smoking-related gene mutations. Given the recall bias in obtaining smoking information, smoking duration alone should be considered for further investigation as a simpler alternative to pack-years.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere035615
JournalBMJ Open
Volume10
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 09-09-2020
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can smoking duration alone replace pack-years to predict the risk of smoking-related oncogenic mutations in non-small cell lung cancer? A cross-sectional study in Japan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this