TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterization of the evaluation method for hepatobiliary phase image by liver magnetic resonance imaging using Gd–EOB–DTPA
AU - Takatsu, Yasuo
AU - Harada, Shohei
AU - Yamatani, Yuya
AU - Fukuzawa, Kei
AU - Nakamura, Masafumi
AU - Takano, Kazuki
AU - Miyati, Tosiaki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2025/7
Y1 - 2025/7
N2 - Purpose: This study aimed to characterize quantitative liver–spleen contrast (Q-LSC) and hepatocellular uptake index (HUI) for evaluating hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images using gadolinium–ethoxybenzyl–diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd–EOB–DTPA) in liver magnetic resonance imaging and to identify differences in the results obtain from these two measurement methods. Methods: Twenty-nine consecutive randomly selected patients were assessed using the 3.0 T MR system. Three regions of interest (ROI) were set for the liver parenchyma and spleen, and signal intensity (SI) was averaged. Q-LSC (SI of the liver divided by the SI of the spleen) and HUI [(Q-LSC-1) × liver volume] were calculated. Moreover, the volume and mean SI of the whole liver and spleen, left lateral segment (LLS), and the other segments were calculated. Subsequently, ROI-based and volume-based values for Q-LSC (R-LSC and V-LSC) and HUI (R-HUI and V-HUI), and the whole and each segment were compared. Results: R-LSC and V-LSC for the whole and each segment were not significantly different. Conversely, all combinations of HUI, except between R-HUI and V-HUI were significantly different (P < 0.01), for the whole liver. Correlations between R-LSC, R-HUI, and volume-based LLS were lower than the others. Conclusion: Q-LSC and HUI were characterized through an imaging evaluation of HBP with Gd–EOB–DTPA. R-LSC and R-HUI, or V-HUI, of the whole liver were strongly correlated, but the LLS affected the data, and HUI depends on liver volume. R-LSC is simple and easy to use for HBP evaluation.
AB - Purpose: This study aimed to characterize quantitative liver–spleen contrast (Q-LSC) and hepatocellular uptake index (HUI) for evaluating hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images using gadolinium–ethoxybenzyl–diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd–EOB–DTPA) in liver magnetic resonance imaging and to identify differences in the results obtain from these two measurement methods. Methods: Twenty-nine consecutive randomly selected patients were assessed using the 3.0 T MR system. Three regions of interest (ROI) were set for the liver parenchyma and spleen, and signal intensity (SI) was averaged. Q-LSC (SI of the liver divided by the SI of the spleen) and HUI [(Q-LSC-1) × liver volume] were calculated. Moreover, the volume and mean SI of the whole liver and spleen, left lateral segment (LLS), and the other segments were calculated. Subsequently, ROI-based and volume-based values for Q-LSC (R-LSC and V-LSC) and HUI (R-HUI and V-HUI), and the whole and each segment were compared. Results: R-LSC and V-LSC for the whole and each segment were not significantly different. Conversely, all combinations of HUI, except between R-HUI and V-HUI were significantly different (P < 0.01), for the whole liver. Correlations between R-LSC, R-HUI, and volume-based LLS were lower than the others. Conclusion: Q-LSC and HUI were characterized through an imaging evaluation of HBP with Gd–EOB–DTPA. R-LSC and R-HUI, or V-HUI, of the whole liver were strongly correlated, but the LLS affected the data, and HUI depends on liver volume. R-LSC is simple and easy to use for HBP evaluation.
KW - Hepatocellular uptake index
KW - Left lateral segment
KW - Liver
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Quantitative liver–spleen contrast
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105002324570
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105002324570#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.mri.2025.110382
DO - 10.1016/j.mri.2025.110382
M3 - Article
C2 - 40086703
AN - SCOPUS:105002324570
SN - 0730-725X
VL - 120
JO - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
M1 - 110382
ER -