TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical application of 11C-methionine positron emission tomography for evaluation of pancreatic function
AU - Kono, Tsuguaki
AU - Okazumi, Shinichi
AU - Mochizuki, Ryoyu
AU - Ootsuki, Kazunori
AU - Shinotou, Kouichi
AU - Matsuzaki, Hiroshi
AU - Natsume, Toshiyuki
AU - Kenmochi, Takashi
AU - Nakagohri, Toshio
AU - Asano, Takehide
AU - Ochiai, Takenori
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Introduction: In recent years, it has become increasingly necessary to evaluate pancreatic function after pancreatectomy, but few precise methods are available. Aims: To evaluate different surgical techniques for pancreatectomy in terms of the preservation of pancreatic function by 11C-methionine positron emission tomography (PET), which determines amino acid metabolism in the pancreas. Methodology: The study included 33 pancreatectomy cases: 5 of distal pancreatectomy, 5 of pancreaticoduodenectomy, 10 of pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, 7 of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection, and 6 of inferior pancreatic head resection. The method was as follows. Approximately 370 MBq 11C-methionine was intravenously injected. Crosssectional imaging of the pancreas was performed by PET after 30 minutes. The images obtained were used to determine the radioactivity concentration in the pancreas. By adjustment of the radioactivity concentration for body weight and dosage, the differential absorption ratio could be determined to indicate the level of accumulation in the pancreas. Each surgical method used was evaluated on the basis of the differential absorption ratio. Postoperative total pancreatic accumulation was divided by preoperative level to calculate the total preserved pancreatic function rate (TPPFR), and postoperative local pancreatic accumulation was divided by preoperative level to calculate the local preserved pancreatic function rate (LPPFR). These rates were then compared for the individual techniques used. Results: The results indicated that TPPFR and LPPFR were 61.2 ± 20.0% and 114.6 ± 29.4% for distal pancreatectomy (n = 5), 31.8 ± 20.0% and 58.7 ± 30.0% for pancreati-coduodenectomy (n = 5), 21.6 ± 14.7% and 58.4 ± 29.8% for pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 10), 47.9 ± 35.5% and 67.7 ± 30.6% for duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (n = 7), and 48.1 ± 29.5% and 83.9 ± 30.5% for inferior pancreatic head resection (n = 6). TPPFR was highest in distal pancreatectomy cases. Among the pancreatic head resections, TPPFR was quite high for both inferior pancreatic head resection and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection. In contrast, TPPFR for pancreaticoduodenectomy and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy was quite low. LPPFR was highest for distal pancreatectomy and only slightly lower for inferior pancreatic head resection. In contrast, LPPFR was markedly lower for pancreaticoduodenectomy and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Conclusion: In conclusion, this method using 11C-methionine PET is clearly useful for the evaluation of pancreatic function after pancreatectomy.
AB - Introduction: In recent years, it has become increasingly necessary to evaluate pancreatic function after pancreatectomy, but few precise methods are available. Aims: To evaluate different surgical techniques for pancreatectomy in terms of the preservation of pancreatic function by 11C-methionine positron emission tomography (PET), which determines amino acid metabolism in the pancreas. Methodology: The study included 33 pancreatectomy cases: 5 of distal pancreatectomy, 5 of pancreaticoduodenectomy, 10 of pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, 7 of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection, and 6 of inferior pancreatic head resection. The method was as follows. Approximately 370 MBq 11C-methionine was intravenously injected. Crosssectional imaging of the pancreas was performed by PET after 30 minutes. The images obtained were used to determine the radioactivity concentration in the pancreas. By adjustment of the radioactivity concentration for body weight and dosage, the differential absorption ratio could be determined to indicate the level of accumulation in the pancreas. Each surgical method used was evaluated on the basis of the differential absorption ratio. Postoperative total pancreatic accumulation was divided by preoperative level to calculate the total preserved pancreatic function rate (TPPFR), and postoperative local pancreatic accumulation was divided by preoperative level to calculate the local preserved pancreatic function rate (LPPFR). These rates were then compared for the individual techniques used. Results: The results indicated that TPPFR and LPPFR were 61.2 ± 20.0% and 114.6 ± 29.4% for distal pancreatectomy (n = 5), 31.8 ± 20.0% and 58.7 ± 30.0% for pancreati-coduodenectomy (n = 5), 21.6 ± 14.7% and 58.4 ± 29.8% for pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 10), 47.9 ± 35.5% and 67.7 ± 30.6% for duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (n = 7), and 48.1 ± 29.5% and 83.9 ± 30.5% for inferior pancreatic head resection (n = 6). TPPFR was highest in distal pancreatectomy cases. Among the pancreatic head resections, TPPFR was quite high for both inferior pancreatic head resection and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection. In contrast, TPPFR for pancreaticoduodenectomy and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy was quite low. LPPFR was highest for distal pancreatectomy and only slightly lower for inferior pancreatic head resection. In contrast, LPPFR was markedly lower for pancreaticoduodenectomy and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Conclusion: In conclusion, this method using 11C-methionine PET is clearly useful for the evaluation of pancreatic function after pancreatectomy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035990222&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035990222&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00006676-200207000-00007
DO - 10.1097/00006676-200207000-00007
M3 - Article
C2 - 12131766
AN - SCOPUS:0035990222
SN - 0885-3177
VL - 25
SP - 20
EP - 25
JO - Pancreas
JF - Pancreas
IS - 1
ER -