TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical use of percutaneous intramuscular electrodes for functional electrical stimulation
AU - Shimada, Yoichi
AU - Sato, Kozo
AU - Kagaya, Hitoshi
AU - Konishi, Natsuo
AU - Miyamoto, Seiya
AU - Matsunaga, Toshiki
N1 - Funding Information:
Conclusions: The ultrafine percutaneous intramuscular electrode was considered practical for long-term FES use. © 1996 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita Japan. Submitted for publication January 11, 1996. Accepted in revised form March 27, 1996. Supported in part by the Research Projects on Aging and Health from the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare. No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated. Reprint requests to Yoichi Shimada, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Akita University School of Medicine, I-1-1 Hondo, Akita 010, Japan. © 1996 by the AmericanC ongress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 0003-9993/96/7710-383753.00/0 DVANCES IN ELECTRONICS have made it possible to A restore paralyzed muscles by functional electrical stimulation (FES). One principal difference among the various approaches to restoration of paralyzed muscles is the use of surface versus internal electrodes for stimulation. Surface electrodes have disadvantages that include the potential to come loose, skin irritation, and poor cosmetic appearance. In addition, surface electrodes cannot stimulate deep muscles. Reliability is also a problem with surface electrodes because small differences in electrode placement create large differences in response, and habituation of the reflex occurs. Percutaneous or implantable electrodes offer the potential advantages of selective activation of individual paralyzed muscles for controlling fine and precise movements with high reliability and reproducibility, ease of use when left inside the body, and stimulation of deep muscles.
PY - 1996/10
Y1 - 1996/10
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the clinical use of the percutaneous intramuscular electrode in functional electrical stimulation (FES). Design: Randomized and controlled study. Setting: A referral center and institutional practice providing outpatients (12 men, 5 women) who had implanted percutaneous intramuscular electrodes for more than 1 year examined. The average follow-up time after implantation of electrodes was 2.2 years (range, 1yr to 4yr 10mo). Overall, there were 327 electrodes (83 upper extremities and 244 lower extremities). Intervention: The indwelling electrode was composed of helically coiled Teflon-coated rope stranded from 19 hard drawn wires of SUS 316L stainless steel (SES 114). Main Outcome Measures: The rates of breakage, movement, and infection, and the number of electrodes that needed reimplantation were evaluated. Results. Only one electrode broke (0.3%) in the iliopsoas muscle at 12 weeks after implantation. Eight electrodes (2.4%) were removed because of loss of sufficient contraction force caused by movement of the electrodes. Movements occurred at 9 weeks in 6 electrodes and at 5 months in two. The failure rate of electrodes in the lower extremities was 3.7%. No failures occurred in the upper extremities. Ten electrodes (3.1%) required reimplantation. Although ten superficial infections (3.1%) were seen around the site of electrode insertion, no removals of electrode were needed. All electrodes in one patient were removed, however, because of generalized methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection complicated with renal disease. Electrodes were reimplanted after improvement of the infection. Conclusions: The ultrafine percutaneous intramuscular electrode was considered practical for long-term FES use.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the clinical use of the percutaneous intramuscular electrode in functional electrical stimulation (FES). Design: Randomized and controlled study. Setting: A referral center and institutional practice providing outpatients (12 men, 5 women) who had implanted percutaneous intramuscular electrodes for more than 1 year examined. The average follow-up time after implantation of electrodes was 2.2 years (range, 1yr to 4yr 10mo). Overall, there were 327 electrodes (83 upper extremities and 244 lower extremities). Intervention: The indwelling electrode was composed of helically coiled Teflon-coated rope stranded from 19 hard drawn wires of SUS 316L stainless steel (SES 114). Main Outcome Measures: The rates of breakage, movement, and infection, and the number of electrodes that needed reimplantation were evaluated. Results. Only one electrode broke (0.3%) in the iliopsoas muscle at 12 weeks after implantation. Eight electrodes (2.4%) were removed because of loss of sufficient contraction force caused by movement of the electrodes. Movements occurred at 9 weeks in 6 electrodes and at 5 months in two. The failure rate of electrodes in the lower extremities was 3.7%. No failures occurred in the upper extremities. Ten electrodes (3.1%) required reimplantation. Although ten superficial infections (3.1%) were seen around the site of electrode insertion, no removals of electrode were needed. All electrodes in one patient were removed, however, because of generalized methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection complicated with renal disease. Electrodes were reimplanted after improvement of the infection. Conclusions: The ultrafine percutaneous intramuscular electrode was considered practical for long-term FES use.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029847310&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029847310&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90061-1
DO - 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90061-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 8857879
AN - SCOPUS:0029847310
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 77
SP - 1014
EP - 1018
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 10
ER -