TY - JOUR
T1 - Combined hepatocellular carcinoma and osteoclast-like giant cell tumor of the liver
T2 - Possible clue to histogenesis
AU - Tanahashi, Chisato
AU - Nagae, Hiroyuki
AU - Nukaya, Takuhisa
AU - Hasegawa, Makoto
AU - Yatabe, Yasushi
PY - 2009/11
Y1 - 2009/11
N2 - Hepatic giant cell tumor is extremely rare, and only five cases have been reported of overt hepatocellular carcinoma, thus its histogenesis is controversial. Herein is reported a case of simultaneous hepatocellular carcinoma and osteoclast-like giant cell tumor in a single tumor. A liver tumor was found in a 74-year-old woman. Histologically the tumor consisted of two distinct components: mononuclear and multinuclear giant cells with osteoclastic giant cells, and a conventional hepatocellular carcinoma. The boundary between the two components showed transitional features. Immunohistochemistry showed that the osteoclast-like giant cells were CD68 and vimentin positive, but cytokeratin and AFP negative, while spindle-shaped cells were positive only for vimentin. In a portion of the hepatocellular carcinoma the cells were cytokeratin-8 and AFP positive. Ki-67 positivity was 10% for the hepatocellular carcinoma, 60% for the spindle-shaped cells, and 0% for the giant cells. It is possible that the tumor might have had a hepatocellular carcinoma origin, given the more highly proliferative sarcomatous changes and reactive osteoclast-like cells. This case provides a clue to the histogenesis of hepatic giant cell tumors.
AB - Hepatic giant cell tumor is extremely rare, and only five cases have been reported of overt hepatocellular carcinoma, thus its histogenesis is controversial. Herein is reported a case of simultaneous hepatocellular carcinoma and osteoclast-like giant cell tumor in a single tumor. A liver tumor was found in a 74-year-old woman. Histologically the tumor consisted of two distinct components: mononuclear and multinuclear giant cells with osteoclastic giant cells, and a conventional hepatocellular carcinoma. The boundary between the two components showed transitional features. Immunohistochemistry showed that the osteoclast-like giant cells were CD68 and vimentin positive, but cytokeratin and AFP negative, while spindle-shaped cells were positive only for vimentin. In a portion of the hepatocellular carcinoma the cells were cytokeratin-8 and AFP positive. Ki-67 positivity was 10% for the hepatocellular carcinoma, 60% for the spindle-shaped cells, and 0% for the giant cells. It is possible that the tumor might have had a hepatocellular carcinoma origin, given the more highly proliferative sarcomatous changes and reactive osteoclast-like cells. This case provides a clue to the histogenesis of hepatic giant cell tumors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350489108&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350489108&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2009.02450.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2009.02450.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 19883433
AN - SCOPUS:70350489108
SN - 1320-5463
VL - 59
SP - 813
EP - 816
JO - Pathology International
JF - Pathology International
IS - 11
ER -