TY - JOUR
T1 - Commutability of National Institute of Standards and Technology standard reference material 1955 homocysteine and folate in frozen human serum for total folate with automated assays
AU - Ihara, Hiroshi
AU - Watanabe, Toshiaki
AU - Hashizume, Naotaka
AU - Totani, Masayuki
AU - Kamioka, Kazuyuki
AU - Onda, Kimiko
AU - Sunahara, Satoshi
AU - Suzuki, Tomoko
AU - Itabashi, Mitsuharu
AU - Aoki, Yoshikazu
AU - Ishibashi, Midori
AU - Ito, Shozo
AU - Ohashi, Koji
AU - Enomoto, Tsuyoshi
AU - Saito, Kensuke
AU - Saeki, Kayoko
AU - Nagamura, Yoichi
AU - Nobori, Tsutomu
AU - Hirota, Kouichi
AU - Fujishiro, Kinya
AU - Maekawa, Masato
AU - Miura, Masakazu
AU - Ohta, Yoshiji
PY - 2010/11
Y1 - 2010/11
N2 - Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate standard reference material (SRM) 1955 commutability as a reference material for serum folate using automated methods. We also designed so as to reduce the intermethod variability present in different automated methods. Methods: Using a microbiological assay related to the 'information value' of SRM 1955 as a comparison method, we investigated the possibility of standardization for the assay values of serum folate as measured by the automated methods (Access, Centaur and Elecsys). In the assay of 50 patient sera by these automated methods, we corrected observed values by the SRM 1955 and compared with comparison values. Results: The observed values of SRM 1955 Levels I, II and III were within or outside (but near) a 95% prediction interval obtained from patient sera by the automated methods. The normalized residuals obtained from SRM 1955 were within ± 3.0 (in SD units), which enabled us to conclude that the SRM 1955 had a physicochemical characterization similar to native serum. Twelve patients were assessed as hypofolataemia (<6.0 ng/mL) and 38 patients as normal (≥6.0 ng/mL). Before correction, folate levels in six of 12 patients were lower than 6.0 ng/mL, and those in seven of 38 patients were higher than 6.0 ng/mL with the automated methods. After correction, low levels were found in four of 12 patients, and normal levels were found in 33 of 38 patients. Conclusions: The use of SRM 1955 would help to reduce the intermethod variability present in different automated methods for serum folate measurement.
AB - Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate standard reference material (SRM) 1955 commutability as a reference material for serum folate using automated methods. We also designed so as to reduce the intermethod variability present in different automated methods. Methods: Using a microbiological assay related to the 'information value' of SRM 1955 as a comparison method, we investigated the possibility of standardization for the assay values of serum folate as measured by the automated methods (Access, Centaur and Elecsys). In the assay of 50 patient sera by these automated methods, we corrected observed values by the SRM 1955 and compared with comparison values. Results: The observed values of SRM 1955 Levels I, II and III were within or outside (but near) a 95% prediction interval obtained from patient sera by the automated methods. The normalized residuals obtained from SRM 1955 were within ± 3.0 (in SD units), which enabled us to conclude that the SRM 1955 had a physicochemical characterization similar to native serum. Twelve patients were assessed as hypofolataemia (<6.0 ng/mL) and 38 patients as normal (≥6.0 ng/mL). Before correction, folate levels in six of 12 patients were lower than 6.0 ng/mL, and those in seven of 38 patients were higher than 6.0 ng/mL with the automated methods. After correction, low levels were found in four of 12 patients, and normal levels were found in 33 of 38 patients. Conclusions: The use of SRM 1955 would help to reduce the intermethod variability present in different automated methods for serum folate measurement.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78449269614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78449269614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1258/acb.2010.010094
DO - 10.1258/acb.2010.010094
M3 - Article
C2 - 20926465
AN - SCOPUS:78449269614
SN - 0004-5632
VL - 47
SP - 541
EP - 548
JO - Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
JF - Annals of Clinical Biochemistry
IS - 6
ER -