TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapies by metastatic site in metastatic renal cell carcinoma
AU - JK-FOOT study group
AU - Toyoda, Shingo
AU - Inoki, Lan
AU - Hashimoto, Mamoru
AU - Fukuokaya, Wataru
AU - Mori, Keiichiro
AU - Nishimura, Shingo
AU - Maenosono, Ryoichi
AU - Iwata, Takehiro
AU - Bekku, Kensuke
AU - Nukaya, Takuhisa
AU - Yanagisawa, Takafumi
AU - Tsujino, Takuya
AU - Komura, Kazumasa
AU - Takahara, Kiyoshi
AU - Inamoto, Teruo
AU - Azuma, Haruhito
AU - Fujita, Kazutoshi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2026/12
Y1 - 2026/12
N2 - Few studies have investigated the efficacy of immuno-oncology (IO) combinations at different metastatic sites in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We evaluated the differential efficacy of IO–IO and IO–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations by metastatic site in metastatic RCC (mRCC). This retrospective multicenter study by the JK-FOOT Study Group included 579 patients with intermediate- or poor-risk mRCC (per International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium criteria) treated with first-line IO combinations between September 2018 and December 2024. Metastatic sites were lymph nodes, lungs, bones, liver, brain, and others. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); the secondary endpoint was objective response rate. Efficacy was compared between IO–IO and IO–TKI for each site. For lymph node (n = 36), lung (n = 132), or brain (n = 16) metastases, OS or PFS was not significantly different between IO–IO and IO–TKI. In bone metastases (n = 80), OS tended to favor IO–TKI (P = 0.053). In liver metastases (n = 22), OS was significantly longer with IO–TKI (P = 0.011). IO–TKI may be a more appropriate first-line option than IO–IO for mRCC with bone or liver metastases, while efficacy is similar for other sites.
AB - Few studies have investigated the efficacy of immuno-oncology (IO) combinations at different metastatic sites in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We evaluated the differential efficacy of IO–IO and IO–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) combinations by metastatic site in metastatic RCC (mRCC). This retrospective multicenter study by the JK-FOOT Study Group included 579 patients with intermediate- or poor-risk mRCC (per International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium criteria) treated with first-line IO combinations between September 2018 and December 2024. Metastatic sites were lymph nodes, lungs, bones, liver, brain, and others. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); the secondary endpoint was objective response rate. Efficacy was compared between IO–IO and IO–TKI for each site. For lymph node (n = 36), lung (n = 132), or brain (n = 16) metastases, OS or PFS was not significantly different between IO–IO and IO–TKI. In bone metastases (n = 80), OS tended to favor IO–TKI (P = 0.053). In liver metastases (n = 22), OS was significantly longer with IO–TKI (P = 0.011). IO–TKI may be a more appropriate first-line option than IO–IO for mRCC with bone or liver metastases, while efficacy is similar for other sites.
KW - Bone metastasis
KW - Immuno-oncology
KW - Metastatic renal cell carcinoma
KW - liver metastasis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105028792016
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105028792016#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-025-33198-x
DO - 10.1038/s41598-025-33198-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 41530265
AN - SCOPUS:105028792016
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 16
JO - Scientific reports
JF - Scientific reports
IS - 1
M1 - 3303
ER -