TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative studies of the same adenocarcinoma cells, macrophages, and mesothelial cells by light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy
AU - Kaneko, Chiyuki
AU - Niimi, Hajime
AU - Shinzato, Masanori
AU - Shamoto, Mikihiro
PY - 1994/12
Y1 - 1994/12
N2 - The identification of cells in body cavities of cancer patients is sometimes difficult to make. In order to make a definite cytological diagnosis, we observed the same cells by using light microscopy (LM)‐scanning electron microscopy (SEM)‐transmission electron microscopy (TEM). In this study we first stained cells by the Papanicolaou method after fixation in 1% glutaraldehyde for LM, and then attempted to observe them successively by SEM‐TEM after fixation in 1% paraformaldehyde and 1.25% Os04. Our method and procedures in examining successively one and the same cells in body cavity fluids by using LM, SEM, and TEM ensured accurate discrimination among adenocarcinoma cells, mesothelial cells, and macrophages. The results of this study suggest that LM‐SEM‐TEM may be of diagnostic value in distinguishing among mesothelial cells, macrophages, and adenocarcinoma cells. This method also succeeded in disclosing differences between the ultrastructure of the cell surfaces, and those of the cytoplasm, and of the nuclei It is desirable that LM‐SEM‐TEM observation can be introduced into various aspects in order to obtain an improvement in the diagnosis by cytologic examination, the judgment of therapeutical effects, drug selection, and prognostic presumption. Diagn Cytopathol 1994; 11:333–342. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
AB - The identification of cells in body cavities of cancer patients is sometimes difficult to make. In order to make a definite cytological diagnosis, we observed the same cells by using light microscopy (LM)‐scanning electron microscopy (SEM)‐transmission electron microscopy (TEM). In this study we first stained cells by the Papanicolaou method after fixation in 1% glutaraldehyde for LM, and then attempted to observe them successively by SEM‐TEM after fixation in 1% paraformaldehyde and 1.25% Os04. Our method and procedures in examining successively one and the same cells in body cavity fluids by using LM, SEM, and TEM ensured accurate discrimination among adenocarcinoma cells, mesothelial cells, and macrophages. The results of this study suggest that LM‐SEM‐TEM may be of diagnostic value in distinguishing among mesothelial cells, macrophages, and adenocarcinoma cells. This method also succeeded in disclosing differences between the ultrastructure of the cell surfaces, and those of the cytoplasm, and of the nuclei It is desirable that LM‐SEM‐TEM observation can be introduced into various aspects in order to obtain an improvement in the diagnosis by cytologic examination, the judgment of therapeutical effects, drug selection, and prognostic presumption. Diagn Cytopathol 1994; 11:333–342. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028633587&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028633587&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/dc.2840110405
DO - 10.1002/dc.2840110405
M3 - Article
C2 - 7895571
AN - SCOPUS:0028633587
SN - 8755-1039
VL - 11
SP - 333
EP - 342
JO - Diagnostic Cytopathology
JF - Diagnostic Cytopathology
IS - 4
ER -