TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing XRISM Cluster Velocity Dispersions with Predictions from Cosmological Simulations
T2 - Are Feedback Models Too Ejective?
AU - XRISM Collaboration
AU - Audard, Marc
AU - Awaki, Hisamitsu
AU - Ballhausen, Ralf
AU - Bamba, Aya
AU - Behar, Ehud
AU - Boissay-Malaquin, Rozenn
AU - Brenneman, Laura
AU - Brown, Gregory V.
AU - Corrales, Lia
AU - Costantini, Elisa
AU - Cumbee, Renata
AU - Trigo, Maria Diaz
AU - Done, Chris
AU - Dotani, Tadayasu
AU - Ebisawa, Ken
AU - Eckart, Megan E.
AU - Eckert, Dominique
AU - Eguchi, Satoshi
AU - Enoto, Teruaki
AU - Ezoe, Yuichiro
AU - Foster, Adam
AU - Fujimoto, Ryuichi
AU - Fujita, Yutaka
AU - Fukazawa, Yasushi
AU - Fukushima, Kotaro
AU - Furuzawa, Akihiro
AU - Gallo, Luigi
AU - García, Javier A.
AU - Gu, Liyi
AU - Guainazzi, Matteo
AU - Hagino, Kouichi
AU - Hamaguchi, Kenji
AU - Hatsukade, Isamu
AU - Hayashi, Katsuhiro
AU - Hayashi, Takayuki
AU - Hell, Natalie
AU - Hodges-Kluck, Edmund
AU - Hornschemeier, Ann
AU - Ichinohe, Yuto
AU - Ishi, Daiki
AU - Ishida, Manabu
AU - Ishikawa, Kumi
AU - Ishisaki, Yoshitaka
AU - Kaastra, Jelle
AU - Kallman, Timothy
AU - Kara, Erin
AU - Katsuda, Satoru
AU - Kanemaru, Yoshiaki
AU - Kelley, Richard
AU - Kilbourne, Caroline
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.
PY - 2025/11/1
Y1 - 2025/11/1
N2 - The dynamics of the intracluster medium (ICM), the hot plasma that fills galaxy clusters, are shaped by gravity-driven cluster mergers and feedback from supermassive black holes (SMBHs) in the cluster cores. XRISM measurements of ICM velocities in several clusters offer insights into these processes. We compare XRISM measurements for nine galaxy clusters (Virgo, Perseus, Centaurus, Hydra-A, PKS 0745–19, A2029, Coma, A2319, and Ophiuchus) with predictions from three state-of-the-art cosmological simulation suites, TNG-Cluster, the Three Hundred Project GADGET-X, and GIZMO-SIMBA, that employ different models of feedback. In cool cores, XRISM reveals systematically lower velocity dispersions than the simulations predict, with all 10 measurements below the median simulated values by a factor of 1.5–1.7 on average and all falling within the bottom 10% of the predicted distributions. The observed kinetic-to-total pressure ratio is also lower, with a median value of 2.2%, compared to the predicted 5.0%–6.5% for the three simulations. Outside the cool cores and in non-cool-core (NCC) clusters, simulations show better agreement with XRISM measurements, except for the outskirts of the relaxed, cool-core cluster A2029, which exhibits an exceptionally low kinetic pressure support (<1%), with none of the simulated systems in either of the three suites reaching such low levels. The NCC Coma and A2319 exhibit dispersions at the lower end but within the simulated spread. Our comparison suggests that the three numerical models may overestimate the kinetic effects of SMBH feedback in cluster cores. Additional XRISM observations of NCC clusters will clarify if there is a systematic tension in the gravity-dominated regime as well.
AB - The dynamics of the intracluster medium (ICM), the hot plasma that fills galaxy clusters, are shaped by gravity-driven cluster mergers and feedback from supermassive black holes (SMBHs) in the cluster cores. XRISM measurements of ICM velocities in several clusters offer insights into these processes. We compare XRISM measurements for nine galaxy clusters (Virgo, Perseus, Centaurus, Hydra-A, PKS 0745–19, A2029, Coma, A2319, and Ophiuchus) with predictions from three state-of-the-art cosmological simulation suites, TNG-Cluster, the Three Hundred Project GADGET-X, and GIZMO-SIMBA, that employ different models of feedback. In cool cores, XRISM reveals systematically lower velocity dispersions than the simulations predict, with all 10 measurements below the median simulated values by a factor of 1.5–1.7 on average and all falling within the bottom 10% of the predicted distributions. The observed kinetic-to-total pressure ratio is also lower, with a median value of 2.2%, compared to the predicted 5.0%–6.5% for the three simulations. Outside the cool cores and in non-cool-core (NCC) clusters, simulations show better agreement with XRISM measurements, except for the outskirts of the relaxed, cool-core cluster A2029, which exhibits an exceptionally low kinetic pressure support (<1%), with none of the simulated systems in either of the three suites reaching such low levels. The NCC Coma and A2319 exhibit dispersions at the lower end but within the simulated spread. Our comparison suggests that the three numerical models may overestimate the kinetic effects of SMBH feedback in cluster cores. Additional XRISM observations of NCC clusters will clarify if there is a systematic tension in the gravity-dominated regime as well.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105042582785
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105042582785#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.3847/2041-8213/ae100c
DO - 10.3847/2041-8213/ae100c
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105042582785
SN - 2041-8205
VL - 993
JO - Astrophysical Journal Letters
JF - Astrophysical Journal Letters
IS - 1
M1 - L11
ER -