Comparison of image quality between electronic and mechanical radial scanning echoendoscopes in pancreatic diseases

Katsushi Niwa, Yoshiki Hirooka, Yasumasa Niwa, Akihiro Itoh, Naoki Omiya, Senju Hashimoto, Hideki Ishikawa, Naoto Okada, Terutomo Itoh, Hidemi Goto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Aim: It is common knowledge that endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) can accurately diagnose pancreatic diseases. Echoendoscopes for EUS are roughly classified into two categories, the mechanical radial scanning echoendoscope (MR-ES) and the electronic linear array echoendoscope, both of which have their merits and demerits. In 2000, a newly designed echoendoscope, the electronic radial scanning echoendoscope (ER-ES), appeared. The aim of the present study was to compare B-mode image quality between the ER-ES and the MR-ES in pancreatic diseases. Methods: Patients with pancreatic diseases (30 cystic diseases and 22 solid diseases) underwent EUS with both ER-ES and MR-ES. The B-mode images obtained using both echoendoscopes were graded using a scoring system and statistically analyzed. The assessed point for cystic lesions was the existence of mechanical-noise-like ring-like artifacts derived using multiple reflections ('ring-down'), grating robe and so on, and that for solid lesions was the scale of penetration. The authors compared maneuverability, endurance and endoscopic images between the two types of echoendoscopes. Results: The ER-ES had a significantly higher score than the MR-ES (P < 0.05) in the analysis of both cystic and solid diseases. There was no apparent difference as to maneuverability, endurance and endoscopic images. Conclusion: Ultrasound images acquired by ER-ES appear better compared with those acquired by MR-ES.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)454-459
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pancreatic Diseases
Endosonography
Artifacts
Noise

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Niwa, Katsushi ; Hirooka, Yoshiki ; Niwa, Yasumasa ; Itoh, Akihiro ; Omiya, Naoki ; Hashimoto, Senju ; Ishikawa, Hideki ; Okada, Naoto ; Itoh, Terutomo ; Goto, Hidemi. / Comparison of image quality between electronic and mechanical radial scanning echoendoscopes in pancreatic diseases. In: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia). 2004 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 454-459.
@article{e55cf16df4964b81b124c274f985a467,
title = "Comparison of image quality between electronic and mechanical radial scanning echoendoscopes in pancreatic diseases",
abstract = "Background and Aim: It is common knowledge that endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) can accurately diagnose pancreatic diseases. Echoendoscopes for EUS are roughly classified into two categories, the mechanical radial scanning echoendoscope (MR-ES) and the electronic linear array echoendoscope, both of which have their merits and demerits. In 2000, a newly designed echoendoscope, the electronic radial scanning echoendoscope (ER-ES), appeared. The aim of the present study was to compare B-mode image quality between the ER-ES and the MR-ES in pancreatic diseases. Methods: Patients with pancreatic diseases (30 cystic diseases and 22 solid diseases) underwent EUS with both ER-ES and MR-ES. The B-mode images obtained using both echoendoscopes were graded using a scoring system and statistically analyzed. The assessed point for cystic lesions was the existence of mechanical-noise-like ring-like artifacts derived using multiple reflections ('ring-down'), grating robe and so on, and that for solid lesions was the scale of penetration. The authors compared maneuverability, endurance and endoscopic images between the two types of echoendoscopes. Results: The ER-ES had a significantly higher score than the MR-ES (P < 0.05) in the analysis of both cystic and solid diseases. There was no apparent difference as to maneuverability, endurance and endoscopic images. Conclusion: Ultrasound images acquired by ER-ES appear better compared with those acquired by MR-ES.",
author = "Katsushi Niwa and Yoshiki Hirooka and Yasumasa Niwa and Akihiro Itoh and Naoki Omiya and Senju Hashimoto and Hideki Ishikawa and Naoto Okada and Terutomo Itoh and Hidemi Goto",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1440-1746.2003.03317.x",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "454--459",
journal = "Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)",
issn = "0815-9319",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Comparison of image quality between electronic and mechanical radial scanning echoendoscopes in pancreatic diseases. / Niwa, Katsushi; Hirooka, Yoshiki; Niwa, Yasumasa; Itoh, Akihiro; Omiya, Naoki; Hashimoto, Senju; Ishikawa, Hideki; Okada, Naoto; Itoh, Terutomo; Goto, Hidemi.

In: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia), Vol. 19, No. 4, 01.01.2004, p. 454-459.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of image quality between electronic and mechanical radial scanning echoendoscopes in pancreatic diseases

AU - Niwa, Katsushi

AU - Hirooka, Yoshiki

AU - Niwa, Yasumasa

AU - Itoh, Akihiro

AU - Omiya, Naoki

AU - Hashimoto, Senju

AU - Ishikawa, Hideki

AU - Okada, Naoto

AU - Itoh, Terutomo

AU - Goto, Hidemi

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Background and Aim: It is common knowledge that endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) can accurately diagnose pancreatic diseases. Echoendoscopes for EUS are roughly classified into two categories, the mechanical radial scanning echoendoscope (MR-ES) and the electronic linear array echoendoscope, both of which have their merits and demerits. In 2000, a newly designed echoendoscope, the electronic radial scanning echoendoscope (ER-ES), appeared. The aim of the present study was to compare B-mode image quality between the ER-ES and the MR-ES in pancreatic diseases. Methods: Patients with pancreatic diseases (30 cystic diseases and 22 solid diseases) underwent EUS with both ER-ES and MR-ES. The B-mode images obtained using both echoendoscopes were graded using a scoring system and statistically analyzed. The assessed point for cystic lesions was the existence of mechanical-noise-like ring-like artifacts derived using multiple reflections ('ring-down'), grating robe and so on, and that for solid lesions was the scale of penetration. The authors compared maneuverability, endurance and endoscopic images between the two types of echoendoscopes. Results: The ER-ES had a significantly higher score than the MR-ES (P < 0.05) in the analysis of both cystic and solid diseases. There was no apparent difference as to maneuverability, endurance and endoscopic images. Conclusion: Ultrasound images acquired by ER-ES appear better compared with those acquired by MR-ES.

AB - Background and Aim: It is common knowledge that endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) can accurately diagnose pancreatic diseases. Echoendoscopes for EUS are roughly classified into two categories, the mechanical radial scanning echoendoscope (MR-ES) and the electronic linear array echoendoscope, both of which have their merits and demerits. In 2000, a newly designed echoendoscope, the electronic radial scanning echoendoscope (ER-ES), appeared. The aim of the present study was to compare B-mode image quality between the ER-ES and the MR-ES in pancreatic diseases. Methods: Patients with pancreatic diseases (30 cystic diseases and 22 solid diseases) underwent EUS with both ER-ES and MR-ES. The B-mode images obtained using both echoendoscopes were graded using a scoring system and statistically analyzed. The assessed point for cystic lesions was the existence of mechanical-noise-like ring-like artifacts derived using multiple reflections ('ring-down'), grating robe and so on, and that for solid lesions was the scale of penetration. The authors compared maneuverability, endurance and endoscopic images between the two types of echoendoscopes. Results: The ER-ES had a significantly higher score than the MR-ES (P < 0.05) in the analysis of both cystic and solid diseases. There was no apparent difference as to maneuverability, endurance and endoscopic images. Conclusion: Ultrasound images acquired by ER-ES appear better compared with those acquired by MR-ES.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2342647401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2342647401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2003.03317.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2003.03317.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 15012785

AN - SCOPUS:2342647401

VL - 19

SP - 454

EP - 459

JO - Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)

JF - Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)

SN - 0815-9319

IS - 4

ER -