TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of laminoplasty and posterior fusion surgery for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament
AU - Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament
AU - Nakashima, Hiroaki
AU - Imagama, Shiro
AU - Yoshii, Toshitaka
AU - Egawa, Satoru
AU - Sakai, Kenichiro
AU - Kusano, Kazuo
AU - Nakagawa, Yukihiro
AU - Hirai, Takashi
AU - Wada, Kanichiro
AU - Katsumi, Keiichi
AU - Fujii, Kengo
AU - Kimura, Atsushi
AU - Furuya, Takeo
AU - Kanchiku, Tsukasa
AU - Nagamoto, Yukitaka
AU - Oshima, Yasushi
AU - Nagoshi, Narihito
AU - Ando, Kei
AU - Takahata, Masahiko
AU - Mori, Kanji
AU - Nakajima, Hideaki
AU - Murata, Kazuma
AU - Matsunaga, Shunji
AU - Kaito, Takashi
AU - Yamada, Kei
AU - Kobayashi, Sho
AU - Kato, Satoshi
AU - Ohba, Tetsuro
AU - Inami, Satoshi
AU - Fujibayashi, Shunsuke
AU - Katoh, Hiroyuki
AU - Kanno, Haruo
AU - Li, Yuanying
AU - Yatsuya, Hiroshi
AU - Koda, Masao
AU - Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu
AU - Takeshita, Katsushi
AU - Matsumoto, Morio
AU - Yamazaki, Masashi
AU - Okawa, Atsushi
AU - Nakashima, Hiroaki
AU - Sakai, Kenichiro
AU - Kusano, Kazuo
AU - Nakagawa, Yukihiro
AU - Hirai, Takashi
AU - Wada, Kanichiro
AU - Katsumi, Keiichi
AU - Fujii, Kengo
AU - Kimura, Atsushi
AU - Kanchiku, Tsukasa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12/1
Y1 - 2022/12/1
N2 - This prospective multicenter study, established by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and involving 27 institutions, aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between laminoplasty (LM) and posterior fusion (PF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), in order to address the controversy surrounding the role of instrumented fusion in cases of posterior surgical decompression for OPLL. 478 patients were considered for participation in the study; from among them, 189 (137 and 52 patients with LM and PF, respectively) were included and evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and radiographical measurements. Basic demographic and radiographical data were reviewed, and the propensity to choose a surgical procedure was calculated. Preoperatively, there were no significant differences among the participants in terms of patient backgrounds, radiographical measurements (K-line or cervical alignment on X-ray, OPLL occupation ratio on computed tomography, increased signal intensity change on magnetic resonance imaging), or clinical status (JOA score and JOACMEQ) after adjustments. The overall risk of perioperative complications was found to be lower with LM (odds ratio [OR] 0.40, p = 0.006), and the rate of C5 palsy occurrence was significantly lower with LM (OR 0.11, p = 0.0002) than with PF. The range of motion (20.91° ± 1.05° and 9.38° ± 1.24°, p < 0.0001) in patients who had PF was significantly smaller than in those who had LM. However, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference among the participants in JOA score, JOA recovery rate, or JOACMEQ improvement at two years. In contrast, OPLL progression was greater in the LM group than in the PF group (OR 2.73, p = 0.0002). Both LM and PF for cervical myelopathy due to OPLL had resulted in comparable postoperative outcomes at 2 years after surgery.
AB - This prospective multicenter study, established by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare and involving 27 institutions, aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between laminoplasty (LM) and posterior fusion (PF) for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), in order to address the controversy surrounding the role of instrumented fusion in cases of posterior surgical decompression for OPLL. 478 patients were considered for participation in the study; from among them, 189 (137 and 52 patients with LM and PF, respectively) were included and evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and radiographical measurements. Basic demographic and radiographical data were reviewed, and the propensity to choose a surgical procedure was calculated. Preoperatively, there were no significant differences among the participants in terms of patient backgrounds, radiographical measurements (K-line or cervical alignment on X-ray, OPLL occupation ratio on computed tomography, increased signal intensity change on magnetic resonance imaging), or clinical status (JOA score and JOACMEQ) after adjustments. The overall risk of perioperative complications was found to be lower with LM (odds ratio [OR] 0.40, p = 0.006), and the rate of C5 palsy occurrence was significantly lower with LM (OR 0.11, p = 0.0002) than with PF. The range of motion (20.91° ± 1.05° and 9.38° ± 1.24°, p < 0.0001) in patients who had PF was significantly smaller than in those who had LM. However, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed no significant difference among the participants in JOA score, JOA recovery rate, or JOACMEQ improvement at two years. In contrast, OPLL progression was greater in the LM group than in the PF group (OR 2.73, p = 0.0002). Both LM and PF for cervical myelopathy due to OPLL had resulted in comparable postoperative outcomes at 2 years after surgery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123240696&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123240696&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-021-04727-1
DO - 10.1038/s41598-021-04727-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 35031694
AN - SCOPUS:85123240696
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 12
JO - Scientific reports
JF - Scientific reports
IS - 1
M1 - 748
ER -