Abstract
Perception of nasal stuffiness, together with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessments were evaluated before and after nasal and/or sinus surgery in 50 Japanese adult patients. Nasal resistance on both expiration and inspiration correlated well with the patients' perceptions (P<0.05). Nasal volumes (0-4 cm and 0-7 cm) obtained from acoustic rhinometry measurements also correlated well with perception (P<0.05). No significant relationships were found between rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric results. Perceptional nasal obstruction, rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric results (except for the sectional areas at the I-notch) improved significantly after the operations. Rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry are valuable methods for assessing nasal stuffiness, but we must take account of the differences between the two methods.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 505-508 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology |
| Volume | 258 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2001 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Otorhinolaryngology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of perceptional nasal obstruction with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver