TY - JOUR
T1 - Comprehensive evaluation of pipelines for classification of psychiatric disorders using multi-site resting-state fMRI datasets
AU - Takahara, Yuji
AU - Kashiwagi, Yuto
AU - Tokuda, Tomoki
AU - Yoshimoto, Junichiro
AU - Sakai, Yuki
AU - Yamashita, Ayumu
AU - Yoshioka, Toshinori
AU - Takahashi, Hidehiko
AU - Mizuta, Hiroto
AU - Kasai, Kiyoto
AU - Kunimitsu, Akira
AU - Okada, Naohiro
AU - Itai, Eri
AU - Shinzato, Hotaka
AU - Yokoyama, Satoshi
AU - Masuda, Yoshikazu
AU - Mitsuyama, Yuki
AU - Okada, Go
AU - Okamoto, Yasumasa
AU - Itahashi, Takashi
AU - Ohta, Haruhisa
AU - Hashimoto, Ryu ichiro
AU - Harada, Kenichiro
AU - Yamagata, Hirotaka
AU - Matsubara, Toshio
AU - Matsuo, Koji
AU - Tanaka, Saori C.
AU - Imamizu, Hiroshi
AU - Ogawa, Koichi
AU - Momosaki, Sotaro
AU - Kawato, Mitsuo
AU - Yamashita, Okito
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025/7
Y1 - 2025/7
N2 - Objective classification biomarkers that are developed using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data are expected to contribute to more effective treatment for psychiatric disorders. Unfortunately, no widely accepted biomarkers are available at present, partially because of the large variety of analysis pipelines for their development. In this study, we comprehensively evaluated analysis pipelines using a large-scale, multi-site fMRI dataset for major depressive disorder (MDD). We explored combinations of options in four sub-processes of the analysis pipelines: six types of brain parcellation, four types of functional connectivity (FC) estimations, three types of site-difference harmonization, and five types of machine-learning methods. A total of 360 different MDD classification biomarkers were constructed using the SRPBS dataset acquired with unified protocols (713 participants from four sites) as the discovery dataset, and datasets from other projects acquired with heterogeneous protocols (449 participants from four sites) were used for independent validation. We repeated the procedure after swapping the roles of the two datasets to identify superior pipelines, regardless of the discovery dataset. The classification results of the top 10 biomarkers showed high similarity, and weight similarity was observed between eight of the biomarkers, except for two that used both data-driven parcellation and FC computation. We applied the top 10 pipelines to the datasets of other psychiatric disorders (autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia), and eight of the biomarkers exhibited sufficient classification performance for both disorders. Our results will be useful for establishing a standardized pipeline for classification biomarkers.
AB - Objective classification biomarkers that are developed using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data are expected to contribute to more effective treatment for psychiatric disorders. Unfortunately, no widely accepted biomarkers are available at present, partially because of the large variety of analysis pipelines for their development. In this study, we comprehensively evaluated analysis pipelines using a large-scale, multi-site fMRI dataset for major depressive disorder (MDD). We explored combinations of options in four sub-processes of the analysis pipelines: six types of brain parcellation, four types of functional connectivity (FC) estimations, three types of site-difference harmonization, and five types of machine-learning methods. A total of 360 different MDD classification biomarkers were constructed using the SRPBS dataset acquired with unified protocols (713 participants from four sites) as the discovery dataset, and datasets from other projects acquired with heterogeneous protocols (449 participants from four sites) were used for independent validation. We repeated the procedure after swapping the roles of the two datasets to identify superior pipelines, regardless of the discovery dataset. The classification results of the top 10 biomarkers showed high similarity, and weight similarity was observed between eight of the biomarkers, except for two that used both data-driven parcellation and FC computation. We applied the top 10 pipelines to the datasets of other psychiatric disorders (autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia), and eight of the biomarkers exhibited sufficient classification performance for both disorders. Our results will be useful for establishing a standardized pipeline for classification biomarkers.
KW - Classification biomarker
KW - Generalization
KW - Major depressive disorder
KW - Multi-site dataset
KW - Pipeline
KW - fMRI
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=86000634452&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=86000634452&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107335
DO - 10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107335
M3 - Article
C2 - 40068496
AN - SCOPUS:86000634452
SN - 0893-6080
VL - 187
JO - Neural Networks
JF - Neural Networks
M1 - 107335
ER -