Consensus on best practice standards for Fracture Liaison Service in the Asia-Pacific region

Ding Cheng Derrick Chan, Lo Yu Chang, Kristina E. Akesson, Paul Mitchell, Chung Hwan Chen, E. Michael Lewiecki, Joon Kiong Lee, Tang Ching Lau, Thawee Songpatanasilp, Kin Bong Lee, Kwang Joon Kim, Jung Fu Chen, Ko En Huang, Yih Lan Gau, Yin Fan Chang, Peter Ebeling, Weibo Xia, Wei Yu, Atsushi Suzuki, Fen Lee HewLeilani B. Mercado-Asis, Yoon Sok Chung, Keh Sung Tsai, Gau Tyan Lin, Rong Sen Yang, Chih Hsing Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary: The Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) Consensus Meeting endorsed by the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF), Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies (AFOS), and Asia Pacific Osteoporosis Foundation (APOF) was hosted by the Taiwanese Osteoporosis Association on October 14, 2017. International and domestic experts reviewed the 13 Best Practice Framework (BPF) standards and concluded that all standards were generally applicable in the Asia-Pacific region and needed only minor modifications to fit the healthcare settings in the region. Purpose: To review and generate consensus on best practices of fracture liaison service (FLS) in the Asia-Pacific (AP) region. Methods: In October 2017, the Taiwanese Osteoporosis Association (TOA) invited experts from the AP region (n = 23), the Capture the Fracture Steering Committee (n = 2), and the USA (n = 1) to join the AP region FLS Consensus Meeting in Taipei. After two rounds of consensus generation, the recommendations on the 13 Best Practice Framework (BPF) standards were reported and reviewed by the attendees. Experts unable to attend the on-site meeting reviewed the draft, made suggestions, and approved the final version. Results: Because the number of FLSs in the region is rapidly increasing, experts agreed that it was timely to establish consensus on benchmark quality standards for FLSs in the region. They also agreed that the 13 BPF standards and the 3 levels of standards were generally applicable, but that some clarifications were necessary. They suggested, for example, that patient and family education be incorporated into the current standards and that communication with the public to promote FLSs be increased. Conclusions: The consensus on the 13 BPF standards reviewed in this meeting was that they were generally applicable and required only a few advanced clarifications to increase the quality of FLSs in the region.

Original languageEnglish
Article number59
JournalArchives of Osteoporosis
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-12-2018

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Consensus on best practice standards for Fracture Liaison Service in the Asia-Pacific region'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Chan, D. C. D., Chang, L. Y., Akesson, K. E., Mitchell, P., Chen, C. H., Michael Lewiecki, E., Lee, J. K., Lau, T. C., Songpatanasilp, T., Lee, K. B., Kim, K. J., Chen, J. F., Huang, K. E., Gau, Y. L., Chang, Y. F., Ebeling, P., Xia, W., Yu, W., Suzuki, A., ... Wu, C. H. (2018). Consensus on best practice standards for Fracture Liaison Service in the Asia-Pacific region. Archives of Osteoporosis, 13(1), [59]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-018-0463-3