Coronary arteriography for quantitative analysis: Experimental and clinical comparison of cinefilm and video recordings

Yukio Ozaki, David Keane, Jean Paul Herrman, David Foley, Jürgen Haase, Ad den Boer, Carlo di Mario, Patrick W. Serruys

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although use of videotape for the recording of coronary angiograms continues to grow, the validity of quantitative coronary angiographic analysis of video images remains unknown. To estimate the realibility of angiographic images recorded on videotapes, experimental and clinical angiograms were recorded simultaneously on both 35 mm cinefilm and super-VHS videotape with normal images and with spatial filtering of the images (edge enhancement) on a digital cardiac imaging system. The experimental angiographic studies were performed with plexiglass blocks and stenosdis phantom of 0.5 to 3.0 mm in diameter. The clinical angiograms were recorded in 20 patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (31 frames before and 20 frames after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty). The cinefilm and corresponding videotapes were analyzed off-line with the new version of the coronrary angiography analysis system. For the experimental study, measurements of minimal luminal diameter obtained from cinefilm, normal-image videotape, and edge-enhanced videotape were compared with the true phanton diameter. In the clinical study the agrrement between measurements obtained from cinefilm and measurements from normal-image videotape and edge-enhanced videotape was examined. In the phantom series the accuracy and precision of quantitative coronary angiography measurement for cinefilm were -0.10 ± 0.08 mm, for normal-image videotape -0.11 ± 0.18 mm, and for edge-enhanced videotape - 0.10 ± 0.11 mm (mean ± SD). In the clinical series, the differences between measurements from cinefilm and normal-image videotape were 0.14 ± 0.20 mm and from cinefilm and edge-enhanced videotape 0.04 ± 0.13 mm. In the experimental phantom study, the use of cinefilm resulted in the most precise measurements. In the clinical study, edge-enhanced videotape provided the highest agreement with measurements obtained from cinefilm. These findings suggest that cinefilm is moore reliable than video as a recording medium for quantitative coronary analysis in scientific studies; however, for routine practice, videotape and edge-enhanced images may provide an acceptable alternative.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471-475
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume129
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01-01-1995

Fingerprint

Video Recording
Videotape Recording
Angiography
Coronary Balloon Angioplasty
Image Enhancement
Polymethyl Methacrylate
Coronary Angiography

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Ozaki, Yukio ; Keane, David ; Herrman, Jean Paul ; Foley, David ; Haase, Jürgen ; den Boer, Ad ; di Mario, Carlo ; Serruys, Patrick W. / Coronary arteriography for quantitative analysis : Experimental and clinical comparison of cinefilm and video recordings. In: American Heart Journal. 1995 ; Vol. 129, No. 3. pp. 471-475.
@article{08cd06f503314cb39f11661b0253d7d5,
title = "Coronary arteriography for quantitative analysis: Experimental and clinical comparison of cinefilm and video recordings",
abstract = "Although use of videotape for the recording of coronary angiograms continues to grow, the validity of quantitative coronary angiographic analysis of video images remains unknown. To estimate the realibility of angiographic images recorded on videotapes, experimental and clinical angiograms were recorded simultaneously on both 35 mm cinefilm and super-VHS videotape with normal images and with spatial filtering of the images (edge enhancement) on a digital cardiac imaging system. The experimental angiographic studies were performed with plexiglass blocks and stenosdis phantom of 0.5 to 3.0 mm in diameter. The clinical angiograms were recorded in 20 patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (31 frames before and 20 frames after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty). The cinefilm and corresponding videotapes were analyzed off-line with the new version of the coronrary angiography analysis system. For the experimental study, measurements of minimal luminal diameter obtained from cinefilm, normal-image videotape, and edge-enhanced videotape were compared with the true phanton diameter. In the clinical study the agrrement between measurements obtained from cinefilm and measurements from normal-image videotape and edge-enhanced videotape was examined. In the phantom series the accuracy and precision of quantitative coronary angiography measurement for cinefilm were -0.10 ± 0.08 mm, for normal-image videotape -0.11 ± 0.18 mm, and for edge-enhanced videotape - 0.10 ± 0.11 mm (mean ± SD). In the clinical series, the differences between measurements from cinefilm and normal-image videotape were 0.14 ± 0.20 mm and from cinefilm and edge-enhanced videotape 0.04 ± 0.13 mm. In the experimental phantom study, the use of cinefilm resulted in the most precise measurements. In the clinical study, edge-enhanced videotape provided the highest agreement with measurements obtained from cinefilm. These findings suggest that cinefilm is moore reliable than video as a recording medium for quantitative coronary analysis in scientific studies; however, for routine practice, videotape and edge-enhanced images may provide an acceptable alternative.",
author = "Yukio Ozaki and David Keane and Herrman, {Jean Paul} and David Foley and J{\"u}rgen Haase and {den Boer}, Ad and {di Mario}, Carlo and Serruys, {Patrick W.}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0002-8703(95)90270-8",
language = "English",
volume = "129",
pages = "471--475",
journal = "American Heart Journal",
issn = "0002-8703",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Coronary arteriography for quantitative analysis : Experimental and clinical comparison of cinefilm and video recordings. / Ozaki, Yukio; Keane, David; Herrman, Jean Paul; Foley, David; Haase, Jürgen; den Boer, Ad; di Mario, Carlo; Serruys, Patrick W.

In: American Heart Journal, Vol. 129, No. 3, 01.01.1995, p. 471-475.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coronary arteriography for quantitative analysis

T2 - Experimental and clinical comparison of cinefilm and video recordings

AU - Ozaki, Yukio

AU - Keane, David

AU - Herrman, Jean Paul

AU - Foley, David

AU - Haase, Jürgen

AU - den Boer, Ad

AU - di Mario, Carlo

AU - Serruys, Patrick W.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - Although use of videotape for the recording of coronary angiograms continues to grow, the validity of quantitative coronary angiographic analysis of video images remains unknown. To estimate the realibility of angiographic images recorded on videotapes, experimental and clinical angiograms were recorded simultaneously on both 35 mm cinefilm and super-VHS videotape with normal images and with spatial filtering of the images (edge enhancement) on a digital cardiac imaging system. The experimental angiographic studies were performed with plexiglass blocks and stenosdis phantom of 0.5 to 3.0 mm in diameter. The clinical angiograms were recorded in 20 patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (31 frames before and 20 frames after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty). The cinefilm and corresponding videotapes were analyzed off-line with the new version of the coronrary angiography analysis system. For the experimental study, measurements of minimal luminal diameter obtained from cinefilm, normal-image videotape, and edge-enhanced videotape were compared with the true phanton diameter. In the clinical study the agrrement between measurements obtained from cinefilm and measurements from normal-image videotape and edge-enhanced videotape was examined. In the phantom series the accuracy and precision of quantitative coronary angiography measurement for cinefilm were -0.10 ± 0.08 mm, for normal-image videotape -0.11 ± 0.18 mm, and for edge-enhanced videotape - 0.10 ± 0.11 mm (mean ± SD). In the clinical series, the differences between measurements from cinefilm and normal-image videotape were 0.14 ± 0.20 mm and from cinefilm and edge-enhanced videotape 0.04 ± 0.13 mm. In the experimental phantom study, the use of cinefilm resulted in the most precise measurements. In the clinical study, edge-enhanced videotape provided the highest agreement with measurements obtained from cinefilm. These findings suggest that cinefilm is moore reliable than video as a recording medium for quantitative coronary analysis in scientific studies; however, for routine practice, videotape and edge-enhanced images may provide an acceptable alternative.

AB - Although use of videotape for the recording of coronary angiograms continues to grow, the validity of quantitative coronary angiographic analysis of video images remains unknown. To estimate the realibility of angiographic images recorded on videotapes, experimental and clinical angiograms were recorded simultaneously on both 35 mm cinefilm and super-VHS videotape with normal images and with spatial filtering of the images (edge enhancement) on a digital cardiac imaging system. The experimental angiographic studies were performed with plexiglass blocks and stenosdis phantom of 0.5 to 3.0 mm in diameter. The clinical angiograms were recorded in 20 patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (31 frames before and 20 frames after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty). The cinefilm and corresponding videotapes were analyzed off-line with the new version of the coronrary angiography analysis system. For the experimental study, measurements of minimal luminal diameter obtained from cinefilm, normal-image videotape, and edge-enhanced videotape were compared with the true phanton diameter. In the clinical study the agrrement between measurements obtained from cinefilm and measurements from normal-image videotape and edge-enhanced videotape was examined. In the phantom series the accuracy and precision of quantitative coronary angiography measurement for cinefilm were -0.10 ± 0.08 mm, for normal-image videotape -0.11 ± 0.18 mm, and for edge-enhanced videotape - 0.10 ± 0.11 mm (mean ± SD). In the clinical series, the differences between measurements from cinefilm and normal-image videotape were 0.14 ± 0.20 mm and from cinefilm and edge-enhanced videotape 0.04 ± 0.13 mm. In the experimental phantom study, the use of cinefilm resulted in the most precise measurements. In the clinical study, edge-enhanced videotape provided the highest agreement with measurements obtained from cinefilm. These findings suggest that cinefilm is moore reliable than video as a recording medium for quantitative coronary analysis in scientific studies; however, for routine practice, videotape and edge-enhanced images may provide an acceptable alternative.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028901916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028901916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-8703(95)90270-8

DO - 10.1016/0002-8703(95)90270-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 7872173

AN - SCOPUS:0028901916

VL - 129

SP - 471

EP - 475

JO - American Heart Journal

JF - American Heart Journal

SN - 0002-8703

IS - 3

ER -