Abstract
The original version of the Supplementary Information associated with this article contained errors in Supplementary Tables 1, 2 and Table 2. The corrected figures are shown below. In the version of this article originally published, GA at screening and CRL in Supplementary Table 1, 2 and Table 2 contained several errors. In Supplementary Table 1, GA at screening (days) in Preterm PE HR-group should be 91 (80–96), those in Preterm PE LR-group should be 91 (77–97). CRL (mm) in Preterm PE HR-group should be 69 (49–85), those in Preterm PE LR-group should be 70 (40–85). In Supplementary Table 2, GA at screening (days) in Term PE HR-group should be 91 (77–96), those in Term PE LR-group should be 91 (78–97). CRL (mm) in Term PE HR-group should be 70 (40–85), those in Term PE LRgroup should be 70 (44–85). In Table 2, GA at screening (days) in Unaffected group should be 91 (77–97). The original article has been corrected. (Table presented.).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 730 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Hypertension Research |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 06-2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Internal Medicine
- Physiology
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Correction: Accuracy of the FMF Bayes theorem-based model for predicting preeclampsia at 11–13 weeks of gestation in a Japanese population (Hypertension Research, (2021), 44, 6, (685-691), 10.1038/s41440-020-00571-4)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver