Correction to: Effect of the Effortful Swallow on Pharyngeal Cavity Volume: Kinematic Analysis in Three Dimensions Using 320‑Row Area Detector Computed Tomography (Dysphagia, (2023), 38, 4, (1138-1145), 10.1007/s00455-022-10539-w)

Correction to: Dysphagia (2022) . The original version of the article unfortunately contained a mistake in the citation of tables 2 and 3. It has been corrected in this correction, and original article has been corrected. In “Results” section under the heading “Upper Pharyngeal Volume”, in first line after Fig. 3, the Table 2 should be cited. During ES, Vmax (ES = 13.2 cm³ (9.4–16.9), control 16.3 cm³ (10.7–20.8),p = 0.008) and Vonset (ES = 12.4 cm³ (7.3–16.8), control 16.2 cm³ (10.7–20.8),p = 0.008) were significantly smaller than control swallows (Fig. 3) (Table 2). In “Results” section under the heading “Other Critical Timing Events”, the Table 3 citation should be added at the end of the last sentence. These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05) (Table 3). In “Results” section under the heading “Lower Pharyngeal Volume”, at the end of the sentence, the Table 2 citation should be added after Fig.3. Vmax (ES = 7.0 cm³ (3.4–9.7), control 6.9cm³ (3.5–8.7), p = 0.612), Vonset (ES = 6.8 cm³ (2.3 -10.9), control 6.9cm³ (3.5–8.7), p = 0.612), and Vmin (ES = 0.03 cm³ (0–0.1), control 0.07cm³ (0–0.3), p = 0.461) were not significantly different between the two swallows (Fig. 3, Table 2).