TY - JOUR
T1 - Deep learning-based and hybrid-type iterative reconstructions for CT
T2 - comparison of capability for quantitative and qualitative image quality improvements and small vessel evaluation at dynamic CE-abdominal CT with ultra-high and standard resolutions
AU - Matsukiyo, Ryo
AU - Ohno, Yoshiharu
AU - Matsuyama, Takahiro
AU - Nagata, Hiroyuki
AU - Kimata, Hirona
AU - Ito, Yuya
AU - Ogawa, Yukihiro
AU - Murayama, Kazuhiro
AU - Kato, Ryoichi
AU - Toyama, Hiroshi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Japan Radiological Society.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Purpose: To determine the image quality improvement including vascular structures using deep learning reconstruction (DLR) for ultra-high-resolution CT (UHR-CT) and area-detector CT (ADCT) compared to a commercially available hybrid-iterative reconstruction (IR) method. Materials and method: Thirty-two patients suspected of renal cell carcinoma underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced (CE) CT using UHR-CT or ADCT systems. CT value and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) on each CT dataset were assessed with region of interest (ROI) measurements. For qualitative assessment of improvement for vascular structure visualization, each artery was assessed using a 5-point scale. To determine the utility of DLR, CT values and CNRs were compared among all UHR-CT data by means of ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test, and same values on ADCT data were also compared between hybrid IR and DLR methods by paired t test. Results: For all arteries except the aorta, the CT value and CNR of the DLR method were significantly higher compared to those of the hybrid-type IR method in both CT systems reconstructed as 512 or 1024 matrixes (p < 0.05). Conclusion: DLR has a higher potential to improve the image quality resulting in a more accurate evaluation for vascular structures than hybrid IR for both UHR-CT and ADCT.
AB - Purpose: To determine the image quality improvement including vascular structures using deep learning reconstruction (DLR) for ultra-high-resolution CT (UHR-CT) and area-detector CT (ADCT) compared to a commercially available hybrid-iterative reconstruction (IR) method. Materials and method: Thirty-two patients suspected of renal cell carcinoma underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced (CE) CT using UHR-CT or ADCT systems. CT value and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) on each CT dataset were assessed with region of interest (ROI) measurements. For qualitative assessment of improvement for vascular structure visualization, each artery was assessed using a 5-point scale. To determine the utility of DLR, CT values and CNRs were compared among all UHR-CT data by means of ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test, and same values on ADCT data were also compared between hybrid IR and DLR methods by paired t test. Results: For all arteries except the aorta, the CT value and CNR of the DLR method were significantly higher compared to those of the hybrid-type IR method in both CT systems reconstructed as 512 or 1024 matrixes (p < 0.05). Conclusion: DLR has a higher potential to improve the image quality resulting in a more accurate evaluation for vascular structures than hybrid IR for both UHR-CT and ADCT.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092401300&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092401300&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11604-020-01045-w
DO - 10.1007/s11604-020-01045-w
M3 - Article
C2 - 33037956
AN - SCOPUS:85092401300
SN - 1867-1071
VL - 39
SP - 186
EP - 197
JO - Japanese journal of radiology
JF - Japanese journal of radiology
IS - 2
ER -