TY - JOUR
T1 - Defining Global Benchmarks for Laparoscopic Liver Resections
T2 - An International Multicenter Study
AU - International robotic and laparoscopic liver resection study group investigators
AU - Goh, Brian K.P.
AU - Han, Ho Seong
AU - Chen, Kuo Hsin
AU - Chua, Darren W.
AU - Chan, Chung Yip
AU - Cipriani, Federica
AU - Aghayan, Davit L.
AU - Fretland, Asmund A.
AU - Sijberden, Jasper
AU - D'Silva, Mizelle
AU - Siow, Tiing Foong
AU - Kato, Yutaro
AU - Lim, Chetana
AU - Nghia, Phan Phuoc
AU - Herman, Paulo
AU - Marino, Marco V.
AU - Mazzaferro, Vincenzo
AU - Chiow, Adrian K.H.
AU - Sucandy, Iswanto
AU - Ivanecz, Arpad
AU - Choi, Sung Hoon
AU - Lee, Jae Hoon
AU - Gastaca, Mikel
AU - Vivarelli, Marco
AU - Giuliante, Felice
AU - Ruzzenente, Andrea
AU - Yong, Chee Chien
AU - Yin, Mengqui
AU - Chen, Zewei
AU - Fondevila, Constantino
AU - Efanov, Mikhail
AU - Rotellar, Fernando
AU - Choi, Gi Hong
AU - Campos, Ricardo R.
AU - Wang, Xiaoying
AU - Sutcliffe, Robert P.
AU - Pratschke, Johann
AU - Lai, Eric
AU - Chong, Charing C.
AU - D'Hondt, Mathieu
AU - Monden, Kazuteru
AU - Lopez-Ben, Santiago
AU - Coelho, Fabricio F.
AU - Kingham, Thomas Peter
AU - Liu, Rong
AU - Long, Tran Cong Duy
AU - Ferrero, Alessandro
AU - Sandri, Giovanni B.Levi
AU - Sugioka, Atsushi
AU - Kojima, Masayuki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/4/1
Y1 - 2023/4/1
N2 - Objective: To establish global benchmark outcomes indicators after laparoscopic liver resections (L-LR). Background: There is limited published data to date on the best achievable outcomes after L-LR. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of 11,983 patients undergoing L-LR in 45 international centers in 4 continents between 2015 and 2020. Three specific procedures: left lateral sectionectomy (LLS), left hepatectomy (LH), and right hepatectomy (RH) were selected to represent the 3 difficulty levels of L-LR. Fifteen outcome indicators were selected to establish benchmark cutoffs. Results: There were 3519 L-LR (LLS, LH, RH) of which 1258 L-LR (40.6%) cases performed in 34 benchmark expert centers qualified as low-risk benchmark cases. These included 659 LLS (52.4%), 306 LH (24.3%), and 293 RH (23.3%). The benchmark outcomes established for operation time, open conversion rate, blood loss ≥500 mL, blood transfusion rate, postoperative morbidity, major morbidity, and 90-day mortality after LLS, LH, and RH were 209.5, 302, and 426 minutes; 2.1%, 13.4%, and 13.0%; 3.2%, 20%, and 47.1%; 0%, 7.1%, and 10.5%; 11.1%, 20%, and 50%; 0%, 7.1%, and 20%; and 0%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. Conclusions: This study established the first global benchmark outcomes for L-LR in a large-scale international patient cohort. It provides an up-to-date reference regarding the "best achievable" results for L-LR for which centers adopting L-LR can use as a comparison to enable an objective assessment of performance gaps and learning curves.
AB - Objective: To establish global benchmark outcomes indicators after laparoscopic liver resections (L-LR). Background: There is limited published data to date on the best achievable outcomes after L-LR. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of 11,983 patients undergoing L-LR in 45 international centers in 4 continents between 2015 and 2020. Three specific procedures: left lateral sectionectomy (LLS), left hepatectomy (LH), and right hepatectomy (RH) were selected to represent the 3 difficulty levels of L-LR. Fifteen outcome indicators were selected to establish benchmark cutoffs. Results: There were 3519 L-LR (LLS, LH, RH) of which 1258 L-LR (40.6%) cases performed in 34 benchmark expert centers qualified as low-risk benchmark cases. These included 659 LLS (52.4%), 306 LH (24.3%), and 293 RH (23.3%). The benchmark outcomes established for operation time, open conversion rate, blood loss ≥500 mL, blood transfusion rate, postoperative morbidity, major morbidity, and 90-day mortality after LLS, LH, and RH were 209.5, 302, and 426 minutes; 2.1%, 13.4%, and 13.0%; 3.2%, 20%, and 47.1%; 0%, 7.1%, and 10.5%; 11.1%, 20%, and 50%; 0%, 7.1%, and 20%; and 0%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. Conclusions: This study established the first global benchmark outcomes for L-LR in a large-scale international patient cohort. It provides an up-to-date reference regarding the "best achievable" results for L-LR for which centers adopting L-LR can use as a comparison to enable an objective assessment of performance gaps and learning curves.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149816720&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85149816720&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005530
DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005530
M3 - Article
C2 - 35837974
AN - SCOPUS:85149816720
SN - 0003-4932
VL - 277
SP - E839-E848
JO - Annals of Surgery
JF - Annals of Surgery
IS - 4
ER -