TY - JOUR
T1 - Defining Global Benchmarks for Robotic Liver Resections
T2 - An International Multicenter Study
AU - International robotic and laparoscopic liver resection study group investigators
AU - Goh, Brian K.P.
AU - Sucandy, Iswanto
AU - Chua, Darren W.
AU - Liu, Qu
AU - Edwin, Bjørn
AU - Aghayan, Davit
AU - Millet, Guillaume
AU - Ratti, Francesca
AU - Zhang, Wanguang
AU - Scatton, Olivier
AU - Coelho, Fabricio Ferreira
AU - Dokmak, Safi
AU - Mazzaferro, Vincenzo
AU - Chiow, Adrian K.H.
AU - Primavesi, Florian
AU - Ivanecz, Arpad
AU - Choi, Sung Hoon
AU - Lee, Jae Hoon
AU - Prieto, Mikel
AU - Vivarelli, Marco
AU - Giuliante, Felice
AU - Ruzzenente, Andrea
AU - Yong, Chee Chien
AU - Yin, Mengqiu
AU - Fondevila, Constantino
AU - Efanov, Mikhail
AU - Morise, Zenichi
AU - Di Benedetto, Fabrizio
AU - Brustia, Raffaele
AU - Valle, Raffaele Dalla
AU - Boggi, Ugo
AU - Geller, David
AU - Belli, Andrea
AU - Memeo, Riccardo
AU - Hasegawa, Kiyoshi
AU - Croner, Roland S.
AU - Gruttadauria, Salvatore
AU - Hawksworth, Jason
AU - Park, James O.
AU - Rotellar, Fernando
AU - Choi, Gi Hong
AU - Robles-Campos, Ricardo
AU - Wang, Xiaoying
AU - Sutcliffe, Robert P.
AU - Krenzien, Felix
AU - Pratschke, Johann
AU - Lai, Eric C.H.
AU - Chong, Charing C.N.
AU - Sugioka, Atsushi
AU - Kato, Yutaro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objective: This study aimed to establish global benchmark outcomes indicators for robotic liver resections (R-LR). Background: In recent years, minimally invasive liver resections and in particular R-LR has seen an increase in uptake in recent years. Although, benchmark outcomes have been recently established for laparoscopic (L) -LR, this has not been established for R-LR. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of 5,213 patients undergoing R-LR in 51 international centers between 2016 and 2022. Benchmark cutoffs for 16 outcome indicators of low-risk R-LR were established. The 75th percentile of individual center medians for a given outcome indicator was set as the benchmark cutoff. Four procedures were selected for benchmarking: left lateral sectionectomy(LLS)/H23, left hepatectomy(LH)/H234±1, right hepatectomy(RH)/H5678±1 and right posterior sectionectomy/H67 (RPS). Results: There were 1,654 R-LR cases (528 LLS/H23, 432 LH/H234±1, 408 RH/H5678±1, 286 RPS/H67) performed in 24 expert centers, of which 518 (31.3%) R-LR cases qualified as low risk benchmark cases. Benchmark outcomes were established for R-LLS/H23, R-LH/ H234±1, R-RH/ H5678±1 and R-RPS/H67 for operation time (190, 323, 474, 413) min, open conversion rate (0.0, 0.0, 1.3, 0.0)%, estimated blood loss (100, 250, 600, 550) mls, blood transfusion rate (0.0,0.0, 20.0, 29.2)%, postoperative major morbidity (0.0,0.0, 20.9, 16.7)%, 90-day mortality (0.0, 0.0,0.0, 0.0)% and textbook outcome (12.5,24.3,0,0)%. Conclusions: The present study established the first global benchmark values for R-LR. It provided an up-to-date reference of best achievable outcomes for auditing and benchmarking.
AB - Objective: This study aimed to establish global benchmark outcomes indicators for robotic liver resections (R-LR). Background: In recent years, minimally invasive liver resections and in particular R-LR has seen an increase in uptake in recent years. Although, benchmark outcomes have been recently established for laparoscopic (L) -LR, this has not been established for R-LR. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of 5,213 patients undergoing R-LR in 51 international centers between 2016 and 2022. Benchmark cutoffs for 16 outcome indicators of low-risk R-LR were established. The 75th percentile of individual center medians for a given outcome indicator was set as the benchmark cutoff. Four procedures were selected for benchmarking: left lateral sectionectomy(LLS)/H23, left hepatectomy(LH)/H234±1, right hepatectomy(RH)/H5678±1 and right posterior sectionectomy/H67 (RPS). Results: There were 1,654 R-LR cases (528 LLS/H23, 432 LH/H234±1, 408 RH/H5678±1, 286 RPS/H67) performed in 24 expert centers, of which 518 (31.3%) R-LR cases qualified as low risk benchmark cases. Benchmark outcomes were established for R-LLS/H23, R-LH/ H234±1, R-RH/ H5678±1 and R-RPS/H67 for operation time (190, 323, 474, 413) min, open conversion rate (0.0, 0.0, 1.3, 0.0)%, estimated blood loss (100, 250, 600, 550) mls, blood transfusion rate (0.0,0.0, 20.0, 29.2)%, postoperative major morbidity (0.0,0.0, 20.9, 16.7)%, 90-day mortality (0.0, 0.0,0.0, 0.0)% and textbook outcome (12.5,24.3,0,0)%. Conclusions: The present study established the first global benchmark values for R-LR. It provided an up-to-date reference of best achievable outcomes for auditing and benchmarking.
KW - benchmark
KW - global
KW - hepatectomy
KW - liver resection
KW - robotic
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105012403718
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105012403718#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006852
DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006852
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105012403718
SN - 0003-4932
JO - Annals of Surgery
JF - Annals of Surgery
M1 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006852
ER -