TY - JOUR
T1 - Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for osteoporosis treatment in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (the DELTA Study)
T2 - A multicenter, non-inferiority randomized trial
AU - Arase, Yoshitaka
AU - Okubo, Tomomi
AU - Arai, Taeang
AU - Abe, Masanori
AU - Namisaki, Tadashi
AU - Uojima, Haruki
AU - Matsumoto, Kosuke
AU - Kakisaka, Keisuke
AU - Setsu, Toru
AU - Mishima, Yusuke
AU - Tsuruya, Kota
AU - Hirose, Shunji
AU - Deguchi, Ryuzo
AU - Shiraishi, Koichi
AU - Atsukawa, Masanori
AU - Ikegami, Tadashi
AU - Honda, Akira
AU - Terai, Shuji
AU - Yoshiji, Hitoshi
AU - Komori, Atsumasa
AU - Tanaka, Atsushi
AU - Kagawa, Tatehiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025/10/12
Y1 - 2025/10/12
N2 - Background: – Osteoporosis is a common complication in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of denosumab and zoledronic acid (ZOL) in treating osteoporosis in PBC patients. Methods: – This multicenter, randomized, open-label trial enrolled Japanese patients with PBC and osteoporosis. Patients were randomized to receive either subcutaneous denosumab 60 mg every 6 months (denosumab group) or i.v. zoledronic acid 5 mg yearly (ZOL group). The primary endpoint was the mean percent change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and total hip from baseline to 12 months. Results: – Of 47 enrolled patients, 41 (87.2%) completed the study (denosumab: n=21; ZOL: n=20). At 12 months, lumbar spine BMD increased by 7.5% in the denosumab group and 6.4% in the ZOL group, demonstrating the non-inferiority of denosumab (95% CI: −1.6% to 3.8%). Although the total hip BMD increased more in the denosumab group than in the ZOL group (5.0% vs. 2.6%, p<0.01), the difference did not meet the predefined non-inferiority margin (95% CI: −1.3% to 6.2%). Serum ALP to upper limit of normal ratio and bone turnover markers significantly decreased in both groups; however, the rates of change were not significantly different between them. The incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in the denosumab group compared with the ZOL group (14.3% vs. 50.0%, p=0.013). Conclusions: – Denosumab is a safe and effective treatment option for osteoporosis in patients with PBC.
AB - Background: – Osteoporosis is a common complication in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of denosumab and zoledronic acid (ZOL) in treating osteoporosis in PBC patients. Methods: – This multicenter, randomized, open-label trial enrolled Japanese patients with PBC and osteoporosis. Patients were randomized to receive either subcutaneous denosumab 60 mg every 6 months (denosumab group) or i.v. zoledronic acid 5 mg yearly (ZOL group). The primary endpoint was the mean percent change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and total hip from baseline to 12 months. Results: – Of 47 enrolled patients, 41 (87.2%) completed the study (denosumab: n=21; ZOL: n=20). At 12 months, lumbar spine BMD increased by 7.5% in the denosumab group and 6.4% in the ZOL group, demonstrating the non-inferiority of denosumab (95% CI: −1.6% to 3.8%). Although the total hip BMD increased more in the denosumab group than in the ZOL group (5.0% vs. 2.6%, p<0.01), the difference did not meet the predefined non-inferiority margin (95% CI: −1.3% to 6.2%). Serum ALP to upper limit of normal ratio and bone turnover markers significantly decreased in both groups; however, the rates of change were not significantly different between them. The incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in the denosumab group compared with the ZOL group (14.3% vs. 50.0%, p=0.013). Conclusions: – Denosumab is a safe and effective treatment option for osteoporosis in patients with PBC.
KW - adverse event
KW - ALP
KW - bisphosphonate
KW - bone mineral density
KW - receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105023904844
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105023904844#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000827
DO - 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000827
M3 - Article
C2 - 41056494
AN - SCOPUS:105023904844
SN - 2471-254X
VL - 9
JO - Hepatology Communications
JF - Hepatology Communications
IS - 11
ER -