TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a method to identify persistent and blanchable redness by skin blotting in mice
AU - Nakai, Ayano
AU - Minematsu, Takeo
AU - Nitta, Shiori
AU - Hsu, Wei Jhen
AU - Tobe, Hiromi
AU - Sanada, Hiromi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Persistent and blanchable redness (PBR) is not currently included in category I pressure injury (PI), which is defined as non-blanchable redness (NBR). However, PBR progresses to PI in a clinical setting. Therefore, it should be clinically managed as category I PI, and a method to distinctly identify PBR is needed. This study aimed to examine whether PI-related biomarkers can distinguish PRB from transient redness (TR) and NBR using skin blotting. TR, PBR, and NBR models were established by the different conditions of dorsal skin compression. Redness observation and skin blotting were performed, and the skin tissue samples were subjected to histological and molecular biological analyses. The vascular endothelial growth factor (Vegf) b, heat shock protein (Hsp) 90aa1, tumour necrosis factor, interleukin (Il) 1b, and Il6 messenger ribonucleic acid levels were significantly different between the three models. The VEGF-A, VEGF-B, IL-1β, and IL-6 protein levels were different between the three models. Although the results of skin blot examinations were inconsistent with those of the expression analysis of tissue, HSP90α and IL-1β are suggested to be potential markers to distinguish PBR from TR and NBR.
AB - Persistent and blanchable redness (PBR) is not currently included in category I pressure injury (PI), which is defined as non-blanchable redness (NBR). However, PBR progresses to PI in a clinical setting. Therefore, it should be clinically managed as category I PI, and a method to distinctly identify PBR is needed. This study aimed to examine whether PI-related biomarkers can distinguish PRB from transient redness (TR) and NBR using skin blotting. TR, PBR, and NBR models were established by the different conditions of dorsal skin compression. Redness observation and skin blotting were performed, and the skin tissue samples were subjected to histological and molecular biological analyses. The vascular endothelial growth factor (Vegf) b, heat shock protein (Hsp) 90aa1, tumour necrosis factor, interleukin (Il) 1b, and Il6 messenger ribonucleic acid levels were significantly different between the three models. The VEGF-A, VEGF-B, IL-1β, and IL-6 protein levels were different between the three models. Although the results of skin blot examinations were inconsistent with those of the expression analysis of tissue, HSP90α and IL-1β are suggested to be potential markers to distinguish PBR from TR and NBR.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141960129&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85141960129&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/iwj.13976
DO - 10.1111/iwj.13976
M3 - Article
C2 - 36367160
AN - SCOPUS:85141960129
SN - 1742-4801
VL - 20
SP - 1168
EP - 1182
JO - International Wound Journal
JF - International Wound Journal
IS - 4
ER -