Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Fujita Health University Home
English
日本語
Home
Profiles
Research units
Research output
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Dexmedetomidine vs other sedatives in critically ill mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
The GUIDE Group
Anesthesiology & Critical Care MedicineⅠ
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Review article
›
peer-review
81
Citations (Scopus)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Dexmedetomidine vs other sedatives in critically ill mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Nursing and Health Professions
Systematic Review
100%
Meta Analysis
100%
Sedative Agent
100%
Dexmedetomidine
100%
Confidence Interval
85%
Intensive Care Unit
57%
Delirium
57%
Hypotension
28%
Artificial Respiration
28%
Length of Stay
14%
World Health Organization
14%
Analgesia
14%
Sedation
14%
Benzodiazepine Derivative
14%
Propofol
14%
Medicine and Dentistry
Meta-Analysis
100%
Systematic Review
100%
Dexmedetomidine
100%
Sedative Agent
100%
Intensive Care Unit
57%
Delirium
57%
Hypotension
28%
Artificial Respiration
28%
Random Effects Model
14%
Analgesia
14%
Randomized Clinical Trial
14%
Benzodiazepine
14%
Propofol
14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
Dexmedetomidine
100%
Delirium
57%
Hypotension
28%
Benzodiazepine
14%
Random Effects Model
14%
Randomized Clinical Trial
14%
Propofol
14%
Neuroscience
Dexmedetomidine
100%
Keyphrases
Binary Outcome
14%
WHO ICTRP
14%