TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic contribution of cytological examination to endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy for lung malignancies
AU - Kajikawa, Shigehisa
AU - Imai, Naoyuki
AU - Okachi, Shotaro
AU - Yatsuya, Hiroshi
AU - Souma, Tomohide
AU - Watanabe, Toshikazu
AU - Goto, Yasuhiro
AU - Minezawa, Tomoyuki
AU - Hashimoto, Naozumi
AU - Imaizumi, Kazuyoshi
AU - Hasegawa, Yoshinori
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Nagoya University.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Although endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial biopsy (TBB) with a guide sheath (EBUSGS) is widely used for diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions, the diagnostic contribution of cytology (bronchial brushing, bronchial washing and biopsy forceps rinse) has not been established. To determine the diagnostic contribution of cytological examination to EBUS-GS-TBB, we reviewed medical records of patients with lung malignancies who had undergone TBB with EBUS-GS (EBUS-GS group, n=187) or TBB without EBUS-GS (conventional TBB [CTBB] group, n=197) at Nagoya University Hospital. Although the mean size of target lesions was significantly larger in the CTBB group than the EBUS-GS group, the total diagnostic rate was equivalent between two groups (EBUS-GS: 73.3%, CTBB: 66.0%). In the EBUS-GS group, cytological procedures increased the diagnostic rate by 9.1% (17/137), compared with only 4.1% (8/130) in the CTBB group. Sensitivity of cytology among biopsy-negative patients was significantly higher in EBUS-GS group than CTBB group (P=0.022). Furthermore, in the EBUS-GS group, among 17 patients whose malignant diagnoses could only be established cytologically, bronchial brushing contributed to the malignant diagnosis in 64.7% (11/17). These data may suggest that cytological examination, especially bronchial brushing, may be an important diagnostic contributor in EBUS-GS-TBB.
AB - Although endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial biopsy (TBB) with a guide sheath (EBUSGS) is widely used for diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions, the diagnostic contribution of cytology (bronchial brushing, bronchial washing and biopsy forceps rinse) has not been established. To determine the diagnostic contribution of cytological examination to EBUS-GS-TBB, we reviewed medical records of patients with lung malignancies who had undergone TBB with EBUS-GS (EBUS-GS group, n=187) or TBB without EBUS-GS (conventional TBB [CTBB] group, n=197) at Nagoya University Hospital. Although the mean size of target lesions was significantly larger in the CTBB group than the EBUS-GS group, the total diagnostic rate was equivalent between two groups (EBUS-GS: 73.3%, CTBB: 66.0%). In the EBUS-GS group, cytological procedures increased the diagnostic rate by 9.1% (17/137), compared with only 4.1% (8/130) in the CTBB group. Sensitivity of cytology among biopsy-negative patients was significantly higher in EBUS-GS group than CTBB group (P=0.022). Furthermore, in the EBUS-GS group, among 17 patients whose malignant diagnoses could only be established cytologically, bronchial brushing contributed to the malignant diagnosis in 64.7% (11/17). These data may suggest that cytological examination, especially bronchial brushing, may be an important diagnostic contributor in EBUS-GS-TBB.
KW - Bronchial brushing
KW - Bronchoscopy
KW - Cytology
KW - Diagnostic yield
KW - Guide sheath
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076284040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076284040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.18999/nagjms.81.4.613
DO - 10.18999/nagjms.81.4.613
M3 - Article
C2 - 31849378
AN - SCOPUS:85076284040
SN - 0027-7622
VL - 81
SP - 613
EP - 620
JO - Nagoya journal of medical science
JF - Nagoya journal of medical science
IS - 4
ER -