Diagnostic Performance of the Support Vector Machine Model for Breast Cancer on Ring-Shaped Dedicated Breast Positron Emission Tomography Images

Yoko Satoh, Daiki Tamada, Yoshie Omiya, Hiroshi Onishi, Utaroh Motosugi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic ability of support vector machine (SVM) for early breast cancer (BC) using dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET). Methods We evaluated 116 abnormal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptakes less than 2 cm on dbPET images in 105 women. Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake patterns and quantitative PET parameters were compared between BC and noncancer groups. Diagnostic accuracy of the SVM model including quantitative parameters was compared with that of visual assessment based on FDG-uptake pattern. Results Age, maximum standardized uptake value, peak standardized uptake value, total lesion glycolysis, metabolic tumor volume, and lesion-to-contralateral background ratio were significantly different between BC and noncancer groups. Area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for FDG-uptake pattern of visual assessment were 0.77, 0.57, 0.77, and 0.71, respectively; those of an SVM model including age, maximum standardized uptake value, total lesion glycolysis, and lesion-to-contralateral background ratio were 0.89, 0.94, 0.77, and 0.85, respectively. Conclusions Support vector machine showed high diagnostic performance for BC using dbPET.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)413-418
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic Performance of the Support Vector Machine Model for Breast Cancer on Ring-Shaped Dedicated Breast Positron Emission Tomography Images'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this