Difference of HBV genotype distribution between acute hepatitis and chronic hepatitis in Japan

Y. Takeda, Y. Katano, K. Hayashi, T. Honda, S. Yokozaki, I. Nakano, M. Yano, K. Yoshioka, H. Toyoda, T. Kumada, H. Goto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)


Background: Recently genotype A which is rare in the patients in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) was frequently noted in patients with acute hepatitis B (AHB). To investigate their clinical and virological features, we studied the AHB patients in the past 5 years. Patients and Methods: 98 patients with AHB and 80 patients with CHB admitted to our hospital between 1998 and 2003 were studied. Results: Genotype A was not found in CHB but was frequently noted in AHB (p < 0.001). Comparison of the clinical features of acute hepatitis between the two major genotypes, A and C, homosexual and heterosexual with multiple partners were frequently seen among genotype A patients (p < 0.001). On the other hand, infection from steady partner showed a tendency to be more frequent in genotype C (p = 0.065). In genotype A, the levels of HBV-DNA on admission was higher (p = 0.007) and AHB has significantly more frequently progress to chronic infection than in genotype C (p = 0.028). Phylogenetic analysis of genotype A revealed that almost all strains from homosexual men belonged not to the African type A1 but to the Western type A2. Conclusions: Genotype A has increased recently among AHB in Japan. This fact may correlate to promiscuous intercourse in high risk group. Prophylactic efforts should be considered to prevent the prevailing of genotype A.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)201-207
Number of pages7
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 01-08-2006
Externally publishedYes

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases


Dive into the research topics of 'Difference of HBV genotype distribution between acute hepatitis and chronic hepatitis in Japan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this