TY - JOUR
T1 - Diffusion weighted imaging with reverse encoding distortion correction
T2 - Improvement of image quality and distortion for accurate ADC evaluation in in vitro and in vivo studies
AU - Furuta, Minami
AU - Ikeda, Hirotaka
AU - Hanamatsu, Satomu
AU - Yamamoto, Kaori
AU - Shinohara, Maiko
AU - Ikedo, Masato
AU - Yui, Masao
AU - Nagata, Hiroyuki
AU - Nomura, Masahiko
AU - Ueda, Takahiro
AU - Ozawa, Yoshiyuki
AU - Toyama, Hiroshi
AU - Ohno, Yoshiharu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2024/2
Y1 - 2024/2
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this in vivo study was to determine the effect of reverse encoding direction (RDC) on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements and its efficacy for improving image quality and diagnostic performance for differentiating malignant from benign tumors on head and neck diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Methods: Forty-eight patients with head and neck tumors underwent DWI with and without RDC and pathological examinations. Their tumors were then divided into two groups: malignant (n = 21) and benign (n = 27). To determine the utility of RDC for DWI, the difference in the deformation ratio (DR) between DWI and T2-weighted images of each tumor was determined for each tumor area. To compare ADC measurement accuracy of DWIs with and without RDC for each patient, ADC values for tumors and spinal cord were determined by using ROI measurements. To compare DR and ADC between two methods, Student's t-tests were performed. Then, ADC values were compared between malignant and benign tumors by Student's t-test on each DWI. Finally, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were compared by means of McNemar's test. Results: DR of DWI with RDC was significantly smaller than that without RDC (p < 0.0001). There were significant differences in ADC between malignant and benign lesions on each DWI (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant difference of diagnostic accuracy between the two DWIs (p > 0.05). Conclusion: RDC can improve image quality and distortion of DWI and may have potential for more accurate ADC evaluation and differentiation of malignant from benign head and neck tumors.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this in vivo study was to determine the effect of reverse encoding direction (RDC) on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements and its efficacy for improving image quality and diagnostic performance for differentiating malignant from benign tumors on head and neck diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Methods: Forty-eight patients with head and neck tumors underwent DWI with and without RDC and pathological examinations. Their tumors were then divided into two groups: malignant (n = 21) and benign (n = 27). To determine the utility of RDC for DWI, the difference in the deformation ratio (DR) between DWI and T2-weighted images of each tumor was determined for each tumor area. To compare ADC measurement accuracy of DWIs with and without RDC for each patient, ADC values for tumors and spinal cord were determined by using ROI measurements. To compare DR and ADC between two methods, Student's t-tests were performed. Then, ADC values were compared between malignant and benign tumors by Student's t-test on each DWI. Finally, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were compared by means of McNemar's test. Results: DR of DWI with RDC was significantly smaller than that without RDC (p < 0.0001). There were significant differences in ADC between malignant and benign lesions on each DWI (p < 0.05). However, there were no significant difference of diagnostic accuracy between the two DWIs (p > 0.05). Conclusion: RDC can improve image quality and distortion of DWI and may have potential for more accurate ADC evaluation and differentiation of malignant from benign head and neck tumors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85182882061&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85182882061&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111289
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111289
M3 - Article
C2 - 38237523
AN - SCOPUS:85182882061
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 171
JO - European journal of radiology
JF - European journal of radiology
M1 - 111289
ER -