TY - JOUR
T1 - Dosimetric and radiobiological analyses of a de-escalation strategy for elective nodal regions in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer
AU - Tomita, Natsuo
AU - Hayashi, Naoki
AU - Mizuno, Tomoki
AU - Kitagawa, Yuto
AU - Yasui, Keisuke
AU - Saito, Yasunori
AU - Sudo, Shuo
AU - Takano, Seiya
AU - Kita, Nozomi
AU - Torii, Akira
AU - Niwa, Masanari
AU - Okazaki, Dai
AU - Takaoka, Taiki
AU - Kawakita, Daisuke
AU - Iwasaki, Shinichi
AU - Hiwatashi, Akio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Introduction: In this simulation study, we examined the effects of a de-escalation strategy with a reduced dose to subclinical nodal regions in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC). Methods: We created two patterns of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for 16 patients with HPV-associated OPC. In the standard and de-escalation plans, the initial field including elective nodal regions received 46 and 30 Gy, followed by 20 and 36 Gy to the cutdown field, respectively. Comparison metrics were set for each organ at risk (OAR). We compared these metric values and the probability of adverse effects based on the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model between the two plans. Results: Both plans generally met the dose constraints for the targets and all OAR. Among the comparison metrics, the mean doses to the brain, pharyngeal constrictor muscle, thyroid, and skin and the dose to a 1 % volume of the skin were higher in the standard plan than in the de-escalation plan (P = 0.031, 0.007, < 0.001, < 0.001, and 0.006, respectively). NTCP analyses revealed that the probability of adverse effects in the ipsilateral parotid gland and thyroid was higher in the standard plan than in the de-escalation plan (standard vs. de-escalation plans: ipsilateral parotid gland, 6.4 % vs. 5.0 %, P = 0.016; thyroid, 3.3 % vs. 0.5 %, P < 0.001). Conclusions: A de-escalation strategy with elective nodal regions is a promising treatment to prevent a decline in the quality of life in patients with HPV-associated OPC, particularly xerostomia, dysphagia, and hypothyroidism.
AB - Introduction: In this simulation study, we examined the effects of a de-escalation strategy with a reduced dose to subclinical nodal regions in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC). Methods: We created two patterns of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for 16 patients with HPV-associated OPC. In the standard and de-escalation plans, the initial field including elective nodal regions received 46 and 30 Gy, followed by 20 and 36 Gy to the cutdown field, respectively. Comparison metrics were set for each organ at risk (OAR). We compared these metric values and the probability of adverse effects based on the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model between the two plans. Results: Both plans generally met the dose constraints for the targets and all OAR. Among the comparison metrics, the mean doses to the brain, pharyngeal constrictor muscle, thyroid, and skin and the dose to a 1 % volume of the skin were higher in the standard plan than in the de-escalation plan (P = 0.031, 0.007, < 0.001, < 0.001, and 0.006, respectively). NTCP analyses revealed that the probability of adverse effects in the ipsilateral parotid gland and thyroid was higher in the standard plan than in the de-escalation plan (standard vs. de-escalation plans: ipsilateral parotid gland, 6.4 % vs. 5.0 %, P = 0.016; thyroid, 3.3 % vs. 0.5 %, P < 0.001). Conclusions: A de-escalation strategy with elective nodal regions is a promising treatment to prevent a decline in the quality of life in patients with HPV-associated OPC, particularly xerostomia, dysphagia, and hypothyroidism.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174713346&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85174713346&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100221
DO - 10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100221
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85174713346
SN - 2405-6324
VL - 28
JO - Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
JF - Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
M1 - 100221
ER -