TY - JOUR
T1 - Echocardiographic Hemodynamics After Aortic Valve Replacement, Wheat, and Bentall Procedure
AU - Niwa, Wakana
AU - Takami, Yoshiyuki
AU - Maekawa, Atsuo
AU - Yamana, Koji
AU - Akita, Kiyotoshi
AU - Amano, Kentaro
AU - Matsuhashi, Kazuki
AU - Takagi, Yasushi
AU - Abe, Tomonobu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/11
Y1 - 2025/11
N2 - Background: Compared with isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR), echocardiographic hemodynamics after Wheat and Bentall procedures, both involving replacement of the proximal ascending aorta with a smaller-diameter graft, have been less thoroughly investigated. Methods: We analyzed 213 patients who received 21 mm or 23 mm aortic bioprostheses (AVR, n = 138; Wheat, n = 43; Bentall, n = 32). Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before and after surgery, and the proximal ascending aortic area (Aa) was assessed using contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Results: The maximal pressure gradient (PG max), derived from the simplified Bernoulli equation, was significantly lower in the Bentall group, whereas pressure recovery (PR), calculated using Voelker’s equation, was lower in the AVR group. A smaller Aa was associated with a higher PG max in the AVR group. The Bentall group exhibited significantly lower energy loss (EL). In propensity score-matched analyses to minimize potential confounding factors, the AVR group showed a significantly lower PR and higher EL than the Wheat group; a significantly higher PG max, lower PR, and higher EL than the Bentall group; and a significantly similar PR but lower EL in the Bentall group compared with the Wheat group. Conclusions: Although limited to bioprosthetic valves, caution is warranted when interpreting echocardiographic PG max after AVR in patients with a small ascending aorta. However, overestimation of PG max was not observed in either the Wheat or Bentall groups, even though both demonstrated higher PR and lower EL compared with the AVR group.
AB - Background: Compared with isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR), echocardiographic hemodynamics after Wheat and Bentall procedures, both involving replacement of the proximal ascending aorta with a smaller-diameter graft, have been less thoroughly investigated. Methods: We analyzed 213 patients who received 21 mm or 23 mm aortic bioprostheses (AVR, n = 138; Wheat, n = 43; Bentall, n = 32). Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before and after surgery, and the proximal ascending aortic area (Aa) was assessed using contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Results: The maximal pressure gradient (PG max), derived from the simplified Bernoulli equation, was significantly lower in the Bentall group, whereas pressure recovery (PR), calculated using Voelker’s equation, was lower in the AVR group. A smaller Aa was associated with a higher PG max in the AVR group. The Bentall group exhibited significantly lower energy loss (EL). In propensity score-matched analyses to minimize potential confounding factors, the AVR group showed a significantly lower PR and higher EL than the Wheat group; a significantly higher PG max, lower PR, and higher EL than the Bentall group; and a significantly similar PR but lower EL in the Bentall group compared with the Wheat group. Conclusions: Although limited to bioprosthetic valves, caution is warranted when interpreting echocardiographic PG max after AVR in patients with a small ascending aorta. However, overestimation of PG max was not observed in either the Wheat or Bentall groups, even though both demonstrated higher PR and lower EL compared with the AVR group.
KW - Bentall procedure
KW - Wheat procedure
KW - aortic prosthetic valve
KW - aortic valve replacement
KW - echocardiography
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021508968
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021508968#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.3390/jcm14217627
DO - 10.3390/jcm14217627
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105021508968
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 14
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine
IS - 21
M1 - 7627
ER -