TY - JOUR
T1 - Effective home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with restrictive lung diseases
AU - Kagaya, Hitoshi
AU - Takahashi, Hitomi
AU - Sugawara, Keiyu
AU - Kasai, Chikage
AU - Kiyokawa, Noritaka
AU - Shioya, Takanobu
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are commonly referred for pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), but the use of PR is not common for patients with restrictive lung disease, neuromuscular diseases, and those who have sustained a severe respiratory illness or undergone thoracic surgery. We investigated the effects of PR in patients with restrictive lung diseases in comparison with COPD patients using a home-based setting. Twenty-six restrictive lung diseases patients and 40 COPD patients who had a Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea score ≥ 2, a clinically stable condition, and who had completed a 6-month PR program, were enrolled in the present study. The definition of restrictive lung disease was a forced vital capacity (FVC) of ≤ 80% of the predicted value with a forced effort volume in one second/FVC of > 70%. Our PR consisted of breathing retraining, exercise training, respiratory muscle stretching calisthenics, level walking, inspiratory and expiratory muscle exercises, and a monthly education program. Patients were strongly instructed to practice this program daily at home, and were supervised by a respiratory therapist every 2 weeks in our hospital. Patients with restrictive lung diseases showed the significant increases in inspiratory and expiratory muscle forces, the 6-minute walking distance, the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire and the Short-Form 36, and decreased MRC scores after 6 months. In conclusion, our home-based PR improves respiratory muscle forces, exercise tolerance, health-related quality of life, and the perception of dyspnea in patients with restrictive lung disease to the same extent as in COPD patients.
AB - Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are commonly referred for pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), but the use of PR is not common for patients with restrictive lung disease, neuromuscular diseases, and those who have sustained a severe respiratory illness or undergone thoracic surgery. We investigated the effects of PR in patients with restrictive lung diseases in comparison with COPD patients using a home-based setting. Twenty-six restrictive lung diseases patients and 40 COPD patients who had a Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea score ≥ 2, a clinically stable condition, and who had completed a 6-month PR program, were enrolled in the present study. The definition of restrictive lung disease was a forced vital capacity (FVC) of ≤ 80% of the predicted value with a forced effort volume in one second/FVC of > 70%. Our PR consisted of breathing retraining, exercise training, respiratory muscle stretching calisthenics, level walking, inspiratory and expiratory muscle exercises, and a monthly education program. Patients were strongly instructed to practice this program daily at home, and were supervised by a respiratory therapist every 2 weeks in our hospital. Patients with restrictive lung diseases showed the significant increases in inspiratory and expiratory muscle forces, the 6-minute walking distance, the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire and the Short-Form 36, and decreased MRC scores after 6 months. In conclusion, our home-based PR improves respiratory muscle forces, exercise tolerance, health-related quality of life, and the perception of dyspnea in patients with restrictive lung disease to the same extent as in COPD patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68849102942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68849102942&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1620/tjem.218.215
DO - 10.1620/tjem.218.215
M3 - Article
C2 - 19561392
AN - SCOPUS:68849102942
SN - 0040-8727
VL - 218
SP - 215
EP - 219
JO - Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine
JF - Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine
IS - 3
ER -