TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of carbon monoxide on early dysfunction and microangiopathy following GalT-KO porcine pulmonary xenotransplantation in cynomolgus monkeys
AU - Sahara, Hisashi
AU - Sekijima, Mitsuhiro
AU - Ariyoshi, Yuichi
AU - Kawai, Akihiro
AU - Miura, Kohei
AU - Waki, Shiori
AU - Nathan, Louras
AU - Tomita, Yusuke
AU - Iwanaga, Takehiro
AU - Nakano, Kazuaki
AU - Matsunari, Hitomi
AU - Date, Hiroshi
AU - Nagashima, Hiroshi
AU - Shimizu, Akira
AU - Yamada, Kazuhiko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Background: Despite progress in the current genetic manipulation of donor pigs, most non-human primates were lost within a day of receiving porcine lung transplants. We previously reported that carbon monoxide (CO) treatment improved pulmonary function in an allogeneic lung transplant (LTx) model using miniature swine. In this study, we evaluated whether the perioperative treatment with low-dose inhalation of CO has beneficial effects on porcine lung xenografts in cynomolgus monkeys (cynos). Methods: Eight cynos received orthotopic left LTx using either α-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout (GalT-KO; n = 2) or GalT-KO with human decay accelerating factor (hDAF) (GalT-KO/hDAF; n = 6) swine donors. These eight animals were divided into three groups. In Group 1 (n = 2), neither donor nor recipients received CO therapy. In Group 2 (n = 4), donors were treated with inhaled CO for 180-minute. In Group 3 (n = 2), both donors and recipients were treated with CO (donor: 180-minute; recipient: 360-minute). Concentration of inhaled CO was adjusted based on measured levels of carboxyhemoglobin in the blood (15%-20%). Results: Two recipients survived for 3 days; 75 hours (no-CO) and 80 hours (CO in both the donor and the recipient), respectively. Histology showed less inflammatory cell infiltrates, intravascular thrombi, and hemorrhage in the 80-hour survivor with the CO treatment than the 75-hours non-CO treatment. Anti–non-Gal cytotoxicity levels did not affect the early loss of the grafts. Although CO treatment did not prolong overall xeno lung graft survival, the recipient/donor CO treatment helped to maintain platelet counts and inhibit TNF-α and IL-6 secretion at 2 hours after revascularization of grafts. In addition, lung xenografts that were received recipient/donor CO therapy demonstrated fewer macrophage and neutrophil infiltrates. Infiltrating macrophages as well as alveolar epithelial cells in the CO-treated graft expressed heme oxygenase-1. Conclusion: Although further investigation is required, CO treatment may provide a beneficial strategy for pulmonary xenografts.
AB - Background: Despite progress in the current genetic manipulation of donor pigs, most non-human primates were lost within a day of receiving porcine lung transplants. We previously reported that carbon monoxide (CO) treatment improved pulmonary function in an allogeneic lung transplant (LTx) model using miniature swine. In this study, we evaluated whether the perioperative treatment with low-dose inhalation of CO has beneficial effects on porcine lung xenografts in cynomolgus monkeys (cynos). Methods: Eight cynos received orthotopic left LTx using either α-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout (GalT-KO; n = 2) or GalT-KO with human decay accelerating factor (hDAF) (GalT-KO/hDAF; n = 6) swine donors. These eight animals were divided into three groups. In Group 1 (n = 2), neither donor nor recipients received CO therapy. In Group 2 (n = 4), donors were treated with inhaled CO for 180-minute. In Group 3 (n = 2), both donors and recipients were treated with CO (donor: 180-minute; recipient: 360-minute). Concentration of inhaled CO was adjusted based on measured levels of carboxyhemoglobin in the blood (15%-20%). Results: Two recipients survived for 3 days; 75 hours (no-CO) and 80 hours (CO in both the donor and the recipient), respectively. Histology showed less inflammatory cell infiltrates, intravascular thrombi, and hemorrhage in the 80-hour survivor with the CO treatment than the 75-hours non-CO treatment. Anti–non-Gal cytotoxicity levels did not affect the early loss of the grafts. Although CO treatment did not prolong overall xeno lung graft survival, the recipient/donor CO treatment helped to maintain platelet counts and inhibit TNF-α and IL-6 secretion at 2 hours after revascularization of grafts. In addition, lung xenografts that were received recipient/donor CO therapy demonstrated fewer macrophage and neutrophil infiltrates. Infiltrating macrophages as well as alveolar epithelial cells in the CO-treated graft expressed heme oxygenase-1. Conclusion: Although further investigation is required, CO treatment may provide a beneficial strategy for pulmonary xenografts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041906383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041906383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/xen.12359
DO - 10.1111/xen.12359
M3 - Article
C2 - 29067747
AN - SCOPUS:85041906383
SN - 0908-665X
VL - 25
JO - Xenotransplantation
JF - Xenotransplantation
IS - 1
M1 - e12359
ER -