TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of single therapeutic doses of promethazine, fexofenadine and olopatadine on psychomotor function and histamine-induced wheal- and flare-responses
T2 - A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers
AU - Kamei, Hiroyuki
AU - Isaji, Ami
AU - Noda, Yukihiro
AU - Ishikawa, Kazuhiro
AU - Senzaki, Koji
AU - Yamada, Kiyofumi
AU - Sugiura, Kazumitsu
AU - Tomita, Yasushi
AU - Nabeshima, Toshitaka
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments This study was supported by a grant from the Nagoya Industrial Science Research Institute and by a 875 Grant for ‘Academic Frontier’ Project for Private 876 Universities (2007–2011). We thank Miss Azusa Kato, Mr. Tomoya Asahi, Mr. Tomonori Hayakawa and Mr. Hiroshi Yonei for assistance.
PY - 2012/5
Y1 - 2012/5
N2 - Since most first-generation antihistamines have undesirable sedative effects on the central nervous systems (CNS), newer (second-generation) antihistamines have been developed to improve patients' quality of life. However, there are few reports that directly compare the antihistaminic efficacy and impairment of psychomotor functions. We designed a double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover study to concurrently compare the clinical effectiveness of promethazine, a first-generation antihistamine, and fexofenadine and olopatadine, second-generation antihistamines, by measuring their potency as peripheral inhibitors of histamine-induced wheal and flare. Further, we investigated their sedative effects on the CNS using a battery of psychomotor tests. When single therapeutic doses of fexofenadine (60 mg), olopatadine (5 mg) and promethazine (25 mg) were given in a double-blind manner to 24 healthy volunteers, all antihistamines produced a significant reduction in the wheal and flare responses induced by histamine. In the comparison among antihistamines, olopatadine showed a rapid inhibitory effect compared with fexofenadine and promethazine, and had a potent effect compared with promethazine. In a battery of psychomotor assessments using critical flicker fusion, choice reaction time, compensatory tracking, rapid visual information processing and a line analogue rating scale as a subjective assessment of sedation, promethazine significantly impaired psychomotor function. Fexofenadine and olopatadine had no significant effect in any of the psychomotor tests. Promethazine, fexofenadine and olopatadine did not affect behavioral activity, as measured by wrist actigraphy. These results suggest that olopatadine at a therapeutic dose has greater antihistaminergic activity than promethazine, and olopatadine and fexofenadine did not cause cognitive or psychomotor impairment.
AB - Since most first-generation antihistamines have undesirable sedative effects on the central nervous systems (CNS), newer (second-generation) antihistamines have been developed to improve patients' quality of life. However, there are few reports that directly compare the antihistaminic efficacy and impairment of psychomotor functions. We designed a double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover study to concurrently compare the clinical effectiveness of promethazine, a first-generation antihistamine, and fexofenadine and olopatadine, second-generation antihistamines, by measuring their potency as peripheral inhibitors of histamine-induced wheal and flare. Further, we investigated their sedative effects on the CNS using a battery of psychomotor tests. When single therapeutic doses of fexofenadine (60 mg), olopatadine (5 mg) and promethazine (25 mg) were given in a double-blind manner to 24 healthy volunteers, all antihistamines produced a significant reduction in the wheal and flare responses induced by histamine. In the comparison among antihistamines, olopatadine showed a rapid inhibitory effect compared with fexofenadine and promethazine, and had a potent effect compared with promethazine. In a battery of psychomotor assessments using critical flicker fusion, choice reaction time, compensatory tracking, rapid visual information processing and a line analogue rating scale as a subjective assessment of sedation, promethazine significantly impaired psychomotor function. Fexofenadine and olopatadine had no significant effect in any of the psychomotor tests. Promethazine, fexofenadine and olopatadine did not affect behavioral activity, as measured by wrist actigraphy. These results suggest that olopatadine at a therapeutic dose has greater antihistaminergic activity than promethazine, and olopatadine and fexofenadine did not cause cognitive or psychomotor impairment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862892212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862892212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00403-011-1192-2
DO - 10.1007/s00403-011-1192-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 22130869
AN - SCOPUS:84862892212
SN - 0340-3696
VL - 304
SP - 263
EP - 272
JO - Archives of Dermatological Research
JF - Archives of Dermatological Research
IS - 4
ER -