TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and safety of Apixaban in the patients undergoing the ablation of atrial fibrillation
AU - Nagao, Tomoyuki
AU - Inden, Yasuya
AU - Shimano, Masayuki
AU - Fujita, Masaya
AU - Yanagisawa, Satoshi
AU - Kato, Hiroyuki
AU - Ishikawa, Shinji
AU - Miyoshi, Aya
AU - Okumura, Satoshi
AU - Ohguchi, Shiou
AU - Yamamoto, Toshihikov
AU - Yoshida, Naoki
AU - Hirai, Makotov
AU - Murohara, Toyoaki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2015/2/1
Y1 - 2015/2/1
N2 - Introduction Apixaban, a factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor, is a new oral anticoagulant for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, little is known about its efficacy and safety as a periprocedural anticoagulant therapy for patients who had undergone catheter ablation (CA) for AF. Methods and Results We evaluated 342 consecutive patients who underwent CA for AF between April 2013 and March 2014 and received apixaban (n = 105) and warfarin (n = 237) for uninterrupted periprocedural anticoagulation. We retrospectively investigated the occurrence of bleeding and thromboembolic complications during the procedural period and compared them between the apixaban group (AG) and warfarin group (WG). Thromboembolic complications occurred in one (0.4%) patient in the WG. Major and minor bleeding complications occurred in one (1%) and four (4%) patients in the AG, and three (1%) and 12 (5%) patients in the WG. No significant difference in complications was observed between the AG and WG. Of importance, adverse event rates did not differ between the two groups after adjusting by a propensity score analysis. In preoperative tests of blood coagulation, there were significant differences in the prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, FXa activity, and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1+2) levels between the AG and WG. Conclusion The use of apixaban during the periprocedural period of AF ablation seemed as efficacious and safe as warfarin.
AB - Introduction Apixaban, a factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor, is a new oral anticoagulant for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, little is known about its efficacy and safety as a periprocedural anticoagulant therapy for patients who had undergone catheter ablation (CA) for AF. Methods and Results We evaluated 342 consecutive patients who underwent CA for AF between April 2013 and March 2014 and received apixaban (n = 105) and warfarin (n = 237) for uninterrupted periprocedural anticoagulation. We retrospectively investigated the occurrence of bleeding and thromboembolic complications during the procedural period and compared them between the apixaban group (AG) and warfarin group (WG). Thromboembolic complications occurred in one (0.4%) patient in the WG. Major and minor bleeding complications occurred in one (1%) and four (4%) patients in the AG, and three (1%) and 12 (5%) patients in the WG. No significant difference in complications was observed between the AG and WG. Of importance, adverse event rates did not differ between the two groups after adjusting by a propensity score analysis. In preoperative tests of blood coagulation, there were significant differences in the prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, FXa activity, and prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1+2) levels between the AG and WG. Conclusion The use of apixaban during the periprocedural period of AF ablation seemed as efficacious and safe as warfarin.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922700094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922700094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/pace.12553
DO - 10.1111/pace.12553
M3 - Article
C2 - 25487164
AN - SCOPUS:84922700094
SN - 0147-8389
VL - 38
SP - 155
EP - 163
JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
IS - 2
ER -