TY - JOUR
T1 - Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition allows a reliable proliferation assessment of small (≤20 mm) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
AU - Nanno, Yoshihide
AU - Toyama, Hirochika
AU - Nagai, Kazuyuki
AU - Lee, Dongha
AU - Uchida, Yuichiro
AU - Ishida, Jun
AU - Takahara, Takeshi
AU - Matsumoto, Ippei
AU - Hatano, Etsuro
AU - Fukumoto, Takumi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Aim: Evidence regarding the reliability of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for assessing histological proliferation and WHO grading of small (≤20 mm) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) is limited. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, we analyzed data from 122 patients with small PanNETs who underwent EUS-TA followed by surgical resection between 2006 and 2022. We compared the histopathological proliferation assessment and WHO grading between preoperative EUS-TA and surgical definitive specimens. Results: Among the 122 patients with small PanNETs (80% with surgical definitive WHO grade G1 and 20% with G2), EUS-TA histology identified neuroendocrine tumors in 101 (83%) patients and provided WHO grading in 85 (70%) patients. Histopathological WHO grading for EUS-TA was concordant with surgical definitive grading in 86% (73/85) of cases, overstaged in 4% (3/85), and understaged in 11% (9/85). Moderate, severe, and fatal adverse events associated with EUS-TA, as classified by the lexicon, were not reported in this cohort. Conclusion: EUS-TA is a reliable method for assessing histopathological proliferation and WHO grading of small PanNETs. However, grading discordance may occur, and a risk–benefit evaluation on a per-patient basis is recommended.
AB - Aim: Evidence regarding the reliability of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for assessing histological proliferation and WHO grading of small (≤20 mm) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) is limited. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, we analyzed data from 122 patients with small PanNETs who underwent EUS-TA followed by surgical resection between 2006 and 2022. We compared the histopathological proliferation assessment and WHO grading between preoperative EUS-TA and surgical definitive specimens. Results: Among the 122 patients with small PanNETs (80% with surgical definitive WHO grade G1 and 20% with G2), EUS-TA histology identified neuroendocrine tumors in 101 (83%) patients and provided WHO grading in 85 (70%) patients. Histopathological WHO grading for EUS-TA was concordant with surgical definitive grading in 86% (73/85) of cases, overstaged in 4% (3/85), and understaged in 11% (9/85). Moderate, severe, and fatal adverse events associated with EUS-TA, as classified by the lexicon, were not reported in this cohort. Conclusion: EUS-TA is a reliable method for assessing histopathological proliferation and WHO grading of small PanNETs. However, grading discordance may occur, and a risk–benefit evaluation on a per-patient basis is recommended.
KW - endoscopic ultrasonography
KW - pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor
KW - preoperative assessment
KW - tumor grading
KW - tumor size
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205835426&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85205835426&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ags3.12871
DO - 10.1002/ags3.12871
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85205835426
SN - 2475-0328
JO - Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
JF - Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
ER -