TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of a dressing film for ultrasound-guided vascular puncture to achieve high-quality imaging and infection prevention
AU - Abe, Mari
AU - Takahashi, Toshiaki
AU - Muta, Miyako
AU - Kawamoto, Atsuo
AU - Murayama, Ryoko
AU - Nakagami, Gojiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Purpose: This study evaluated the quality of ultrasound images obtained during peripheral vascular catheter insertion using a transparent film designed to maintain puncture site sterility during ultrasound-guided puncture. Methods: Images were collected from 10 healthy adult participants with and without film, focusing on the radial artery, forearm cephalic vein, and median cubital vein. In total, 300 ultrasound still images were assessed using a 10-point Likert scale. Results: Image quality was significantly lower at all sites with the film (mean total image quality: radial artery, 5.2 vs. 6.0: p = 0.019; forearm cephalic vein, 6.1 vs. 7.6: p < 0.001; median cubital vein, 6.0 vs. 7.4: p < 0.001). However, the clinical nurse’s evaluation of puncture feasibility showed no significant difference for the radial artery (80.0% vs 96.7%) and forearm cephalic vein (100.0% vs 100.0%). Conclusion: Compromised image quality using the film does not negatively affect the puncturability of the radial artery and forearm veins. This finding underscores the potential for maintaining sterile conditions during procedures without compromising the ability to successfully perform puncture, thereby improving patient outcomes and procedural efficiency.
AB - Purpose: This study evaluated the quality of ultrasound images obtained during peripheral vascular catheter insertion using a transparent film designed to maintain puncture site sterility during ultrasound-guided puncture. Methods: Images were collected from 10 healthy adult participants with and without film, focusing on the radial artery, forearm cephalic vein, and median cubital vein. In total, 300 ultrasound still images were assessed using a 10-point Likert scale. Results: Image quality was significantly lower at all sites with the film (mean total image quality: radial artery, 5.2 vs. 6.0: p = 0.019; forearm cephalic vein, 6.1 vs. 7.6: p < 0.001; median cubital vein, 6.0 vs. 7.4: p < 0.001). However, the clinical nurse’s evaluation of puncture feasibility showed no significant difference for the radial artery (80.0% vs 96.7%) and forearm cephalic vein (100.0% vs 100.0%). Conclusion: Compromised image quality using the film does not negatively affect the puncturability of the radial artery and forearm veins. This finding underscores the potential for maintaining sterile conditions during procedures without compromising the ability to successfully perform puncture, thereby improving patient outcomes and procedural efficiency.
KW - Forearm
KW - Infection control
KW - Peripheral vascular access
KW - Punctures
KW - Radial artery
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105014884508
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105014884508#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1007/s40477-025-01067-y
DO - 10.1007/s40477-025-01067-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 40886216
AN - SCOPUS:105014884508
SN - 1971-3495
VL - 28
SP - 925
EP - 930
JO - Journal of Ultrasound
JF - Journal of Ultrasound
IS - 4
ER -