TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of prognosis after thoracoscopic lobectomy for primary lung cancer
AU - Tochii, Sachiko
AU - Kawai, Hiroshi
AU - Ishizawa, Hisatoo
AU - Nagano, Hiromitsu
AU - Negi, Takahiro
AU - Tochii, Daisuke
AU - Suda, Takashi
AU - Hoshikawa, Yasushi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Asia Endosurgery Task Force and Japan Society of Endoscopic Surgery and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PY - 2021/4/1
Y1 - 2021/4/1
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Thoracoscopic lobectomy for primary lung cancer is performed at many institutions. However, few reports are available on postoperative prognosis for progressive stages. In 2004, we adopted lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), which would be applicable to the clinical stages up to stage IIIA. This study reports long-term outcomes of surgery for primary lung cancer at several stages, including IIIA. METHODS: We compared the long-term outcomes of 315 VATS cases with those of 159 open thoracotomy cases. RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival rate was 78.1% for the VATS group and 61.9% for the open thoracotomy group. A statistically significant difference between the survival curves of the two groups was observed (P = .001). When analyzing the survival curves for both groups by pathological (p) stage, significant differences were observed for p-stages IB and IIIA, with the VATS group producing better results than the open thoracotomy group. CONCLUSION: The long-term outcomes of patients with primary lung cancer at our institution were more favorable in the group undergoing VATS lobectomy than in the group undergoing open thoracotomy.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Thoracoscopic lobectomy for primary lung cancer is performed at many institutions. However, few reports are available on postoperative prognosis for progressive stages. In 2004, we adopted lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), which would be applicable to the clinical stages up to stage IIIA. This study reports long-term outcomes of surgery for primary lung cancer at several stages, including IIIA. METHODS: We compared the long-term outcomes of 315 VATS cases with those of 159 open thoracotomy cases. RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival rate was 78.1% for the VATS group and 61.9% for the open thoracotomy group. A statistically significant difference between the survival curves of the two groups was observed (P = .001). When analyzing the survival curves for both groups by pathological (p) stage, significant differences were observed for p-stages IB and IIIA, with the VATS group producing better results than the open thoracotomy group. CONCLUSION: The long-term outcomes of patients with primary lung cancer at our institution were more favorable in the group undergoing VATS lobectomy than in the group undergoing open thoracotomy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103800455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85103800455&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ases.12838
DO - 10.1111/ases.12838
M3 - Article
C2 - 32720475
AN - SCOPUS:85103800455
SN - 1758-5902
VL - 14
SP - 178
EP - 183
JO - Asian journal of endoscopic surgery
JF - Asian journal of endoscopic surgery
IS - 2
ER -