TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of the delta-shaped anastomosis in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy
T2 - Midterm results of a comparison with Roux-en-Y anastomosis
AU - Kitagami, Hidehiko
AU - Morimoto, Mamoru
AU - Nozawa, Masashi
AU - Nakamura, Kenichi
AU - Tanimura, Shinya
AU - Murakawa, Katsuhiko
AU - Murakami, Yoshihiro
AU - Kikuchi, Kenji
AU - Ushigome, Hajime
AU - Sato, Leo
AU - Yamamoto, Minoru
AU - Shimizu, Yasunobu
AU - Hayakawa, Tetsushi
AU - Tanaka, Moritsugu
AU - Hirano, Satoshi
PY - 2014/7
Y1 - 2014/7
N2 - Background: Various methods of reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) have been developed and published, whereas only a limited number of reports are available on the utility of the delta-shaped anastomosis (Delta). This study compared Delta and Roux-en-Y anastomoses (RY), with the aim to clarify the utility of Delta. Methods: Stage 1 gastric cancer patients who had undergone LDG with Delta (group D, n = 68) and those who had undergone LDG with RY (group RY, n = 60) were compared in terms of operative outcomes, postoperative clinical symptoms, gastrointestinal fiberscopic findings, and changes in body weight. Results: Both the operative and anastomotic times were significantly shorter in group D (230 and 13 min, respectively) than in group RY (258 and 38 min, respectively) (p < 0.001). Among the complications observed at the anastomotic site, obstruction was seen in one group D patient and two group RY patients but was relieved with conservative management. Postoperative clinical symptoms were reported for 26.4 % of the group D patients but had decreased to 5.9 % 1 year later. Group RY yielded similar results. Upper gastrointestinal fiberscopy performed 1 year postoperatively showed no intergroup differences in the incidence of gastritis or residual retention and a significantly more frequent occurrence of bile reflux in group D. Postoperative weight changes did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions: Delta reconstruction after LDG is a safe and effective procedure that is totally laparoscopic, less time consuming, and associated with a favorable postoperative course and a better quality of life.
AB - Background: Various methods of reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) have been developed and published, whereas only a limited number of reports are available on the utility of the delta-shaped anastomosis (Delta). This study compared Delta and Roux-en-Y anastomoses (RY), with the aim to clarify the utility of Delta. Methods: Stage 1 gastric cancer patients who had undergone LDG with Delta (group D, n = 68) and those who had undergone LDG with RY (group RY, n = 60) were compared in terms of operative outcomes, postoperative clinical symptoms, gastrointestinal fiberscopic findings, and changes in body weight. Results: Both the operative and anastomotic times were significantly shorter in group D (230 and 13 min, respectively) than in group RY (258 and 38 min, respectively) (p < 0.001). Among the complications observed at the anastomotic site, obstruction was seen in one group D patient and two group RY patients but was relieved with conservative management. Postoperative clinical symptoms were reported for 26.4 % of the group D patients but had decreased to 5.9 % 1 year later. Group RY yielded similar results. Upper gastrointestinal fiberscopy performed 1 year postoperatively showed no intergroup differences in the incidence of gastritis or residual retention and a significantly more frequent occurrence of bile reflux in group D. Postoperative weight changes did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions: Delta reconstruction after LDG is a safe and effective procedure that is totally laparoscopic, less time consuming, and associated with a favorable postoperative course and a better quality of life.
KW - Billroth I reconstruction
KW - Delta-shaped anastomosis
KW - Intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy
KW - Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903626383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903626383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-014-3445-6
DO - 10.1007/s00464-014-3445-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 24515263
AN - SCOPUS:84903626383
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 28
SP - 2137
EP - 2144
JO - Surgical endoscopy
JF - Surgical endoscopy
IS - 7
ER -