Evaluation of visually estimated ejection fraction: Comparison with biplane two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and helical computed tomography

Hitoshi Inuduka; Masatsugu Iwase; Yasufumi Anno; Yukiko Nakano; Miho Kato; Kunihiko Sugimoto; Katsusuke Kaziwara; Akira Yamada; Hiroyuki Matsuyama; Hitoshi Hishida

doi:10.3179/jjmu.34.579

Evaluation of visually estimated ejection fraction: Comparison with biplane two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and helical computed tomography

Hitoshi Inuduka, Masatsugu Iwase, Yasufumi Anno, Yukiko Nakano, Miho Kato, Kunihiko Sugimoto, Katsusuke Kaziwara, Akira Yamada, Hiroyuki Matsuyama, Hitoshi Hishida

Cardiology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate visually estimated ejection fraction (EF)by comparing it with EF measured by three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE-EF). Ninety-seven patients with sinus rhythm (aged 62. 9± 13. 9 years) werestudied, including 21 patients whose EF was evaluated by helical computed tomography (HCT-EF). 3DE-EF was significantlycorrelated with HCT-EF(r=0. 92, 95% CI=7. 7± 14. 9%)In comparison with 3DE-EF as the gold standard, visual EF had a better correlation (r=0. 88, 95% CI=- 2. 0± 13. 5%)than bp-EF (r=0. 83, 95% CI=0. 1± 14. 2%)in subjects with left ventricular (LV) asynergy. These findings suggest that 3 DE-EF or visual EF would be more appropriate than bp-EF in evaluating EF in patients with LV asynergy. Visual EF would be more practical because of its facility. However, visual EF requires a technician with a certain degree of experience.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	579-586
Number of pages	8
Journal	Choonpa Igaku
Volume	34
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3179/jjmu.34.579
Publication status	Published - 01-01-2007

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Access to Document

10.3179/jjmu.34.579

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of visually estimated ejection fraction: Comparison with biplane two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and helical computed tomography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Inuduka, H., Iwase, M., Anno, Y., Nakano, Y., Kato, M., Sugimoto, K., Kaziwara, K., Yamada, A., Matsuyama, H., & Hishida, H. (2007). Evaluation of visually estimated ejection fraction: Comparison with biplane two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and helical computed tomography. Choonpa Igaku, 34(6), 579-586. https://doi.org/10.3179/jjmu.34.579

Inuduka, Hitoshi ; Iwase, Masatsugu ; Anno, Yasufumi ; Nakano, Yukiko ; Kato, Miho ; Sugimoto, Kunihiko ; Kaziwara, Katsusuke ; Yamada, Akira ; Matsuyama, Hiroyuki ; Hishida, Hitoshi. / Evaluation of visually estimated ejection fraction : Comparison with biplane two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and helical computed tomography. In: Choonpa Igaku. 2007 ; Vol. 34, No. 6. pp. 579-586.

@article{cc36bb3d5e554cbca0775a49b38dc672,

title = "Evaluation of visually estimated ejection fraction: Comparison with biplane two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and helical computed tomography",

abstract = "The purpose of this study was to evaluate visually estimated ejection fraction (EF)by comparing it with EF measured by three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE-EF). Ninety-seven patients with sinus rhythm (aged 62. 9± 13. 9 years) werestudied, including 21 patients whose EF was evaluated by helical computed tomography (HCT-EF). 3DE-EF was significantlycorrelated with HCT-EF(r=0. 92, 95% CI=7. 7± 14. 9%)In comparison with 3DE-EF as the gold standard, visual EF had a better correlation (r=0. 88, 95% CI=- 2. 0± 13. 5%)than bp-EF (r=0. 83, 95% CI=0. 1± 14. 2%)in subjects with left ventricular (LV) asynergy. These findings suggest that 3 DE-EF or visual EF would be more appropriate than bp-EF in evaluating EF in patients with LV asynergy. Visual EF would be more practical because of its facility. However, visual EF requires a technician with a certain degree of experience.",

author = "Hitoshi Inuduka and Masatsugu Iwase and Yasufumi Anno and Yukiko Nakano and Miho Kato and Kunihiko Sugimoto and Katsusuke Kaziwara and Akira Yamada and Hiroyuki Matsuyama and Hitoshi Hishida",

year = "2007",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.3179/jjmu.34.579",

language = "English",

volume = "34",

pages = "579--586",

journal = "choonpa igaku",

issn = "1346-1176",

publisher = "Nihon Chaoonpa Igakkai",

number = "6",

}

Evaluation of visually estimated ejection fraction : Comparison with biplane two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and helical computed tomography. / Inuduka, Hitoshi; Iwase, Masatsugu; Anno, Yasufumi; Nakano, Yukiko; Kato, Miho; Sugimoto, Kunihiko; Kaziwara, Katsusuke; Yamada, Akira; Matsuyama, Hiroyuki; Hishida, Hitoshi.

In: Choonpa Igaku, Vol. 34, No. 6, 01.01.2007, p. 579-586.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of visually estimated ejection fraction

T2 - Comparison with biplane two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and helical computed tomography

AU - Inuduka, Hitoshi

AU - Iwase, Masatsugu

AU - Anno, Yasufumi

AU - Nakano, Yukiko

AU - Kato, Miho

AU - Sugimoto, Kunihiko

AU - Kaziwara, Katsusuke

AU - Yamada, Akira

AU - Matsuyama, Hiroyuki

AU - Hishida, Hitoshi

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate visually estimated ejection fraction (EF)by comparing it with EF measured by three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE-EF). Ninety-seven patients with sinus rhythm (aged 62. 9± 13. 9 years) werestudied, including 21 patients whose EF was evaluated by helical computed tomography (HCT-EF). 3DE-EF was significantlycorrelated with HCT-EF(r=0. 92, 95% CI=7. 7± 14. 9%)In comparison with 3DE-EF as the gold standard, visual EF had a better correlation (r=0. 88, 95% CI=- 2. 0± 13. 5%)than bp-EF (r=0. 83, 95% CI=0. 1± 14. 2%)in subjects with left ventricular (LV) asynergy. These findings suggest that 3 DE-EF or visual EF would be more appropriate than bp-EF in evaluating EF in patients with LV asynergy. Visual EF would be more practical because of its facility. However, visual EF requires a technician with a certain degree of experience.

AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate visually estimated ejection fraction (EF)by comparing it with EF measured by three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE-EF). Ninety-seven patients with sinus rhythm (aged 62. 9± 13. 9 years) werestudied, including 21 patients whose EF was evaluated by helical computed tomography (HCT-EF). 3DE-EF was significantlycorrelated with HCT-EF(r=0. 92, 95% CI=7. 7± 14. 9%)In comparison with 3DE-EF as the gold standard, visual EF had a better correlation (r=0. 88, 95% CI=- 2. 0± 13. 5%)than bp-EF (r=0. 83, 95% CI=0. 1± 14. 2%)in subjects with left ventricular (LV) asynergy. These findings suggest that 3 DE-EF or visual EF would be more appropriate than bp-EF in evaluating EF in patients with LV asynergy. Visual EF would be more practical because of its facility. However, visual EF requires a technician with a certain degree of experience.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009592461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009592461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3179/jjmu.34.579

DO - 10.3179/jjmu.34.579

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85009592461

VL - 34

SP - 579

EP - 586

JO - choonpa igaku

JF - choonpa igaku

SN - 1346-1176

IS - 6

ER -