TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors Affecting Nonfunctioning Small Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Proposed New Treatment Strategies
AU - Japan Pancreas Society Clinical Research Promotion Committee Group (Corporate Authorship)
AU - Hijioka, Susumu
AU - Yamashige, Daiki
AU - Esaki, Minoru
AU - Honda, Goro
AU - Higuchi, Ryota
AU - Masui, Toshihiko
AU - Shimizu, Yasuhiro
AU - Ohtsuka, Masayuki
AU - Kumamoto, Yusuke
AU - Katanuma, Akio
AU - Gotohda, Naoto
AU - Akita, Hirofumi
AU - Unno, Michiaki
AU - Endo, Itaru
AU - Yokoyama, Yukihiro
AU - Yamada, Suguru
AU - Matsumoto, Ippei
AU - Ohtsuka, Takao
AU - Hirano, Satoshi
AU - Yasuda, Hiroaki
AU - Kawai, Manabu
AU - Aoki, Taku
AU - Nakamura, Masafumi
AU - Hashimoto, Daisuke
AU - Rikiyama, Toshiki
AU - Horiguchi, Akihiko
AU - Fujii, Tsutomu
AU - Mizuno, Shugo
AU - Hanada, Keiji
AU - Tani, Masaji
AU - Hatori, Takashi
AU - Ito, Tetsuhide
AU - Okuno, Masataka
AU - Kagawa, Shingo
AU - Tajima, Hiroshi
AU - Ishii, Tatsuya
AU - Sugimoto, Motokazu
AU - Onoe, Shunsuke
AU - Takami, Hideki
AU - Takada, Ryoji
AU - Miura, Takayuki
AU - Kurita, Yusuke
AU - Kamei, Keiko
AU - Mataki, Yuko
AU - Okazaki, Kazuichi
AU - Takeyama, Yoshifumi
AU - Yamaue, Hiroki
AU - Satoi, Sohei
AU - Shimura, Masahiro
AU - Hirooka, Yoshiki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Background & Aims: Despite previously reported treatment strategies for nonfunctioning small (≤20 mm) pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs), uncertainties persist. We aimed to evaluate the surgically resected cases of nonfunctioning small pNENs (NF-spNENs) in a large Japanese cohort to elucidate an optimal treatment strategy for NF-spNENs. Methods: In this Japanese multicenter study, data were retrospectively collected from patients who underwent pancreatectomy between January 1996 and December 2019, were pathologically diagnosed with pNEN, and were treated according to the World Health Organization 2019 classification. Overall, 1490 patients met the eligibility criteria, and 1014 were included in the analysis cohort. Results: In the analysis cohort, 606 patients (59.8%) had NF-spNENs, with 82% classified as grade 1 (NET-G1) and 18% as grade 2 (NET-G2) or higher. The incidence of lymph node metastasis (N1) by grade was significantly higher in NET-G2 (G1: 3.1% vs G2: 15.0%). Independent factors contributing to N1 were NET-G2 or higher and tumor diameter ≥15 mm. The predictive ability of tumor size for N1 was high. Independent factors contributing to recurrence included multiple lesions, NET-G2 or higher, tumor diameter ≥15 mm, and N1. However, the independent factor contributing to survival was tumor grade (NET-G2 or higher). The appropriate timing for surgical resection of NET-G1 and NET-G2 or higher was when tumors were >20 and >10 mm, respectively. For neoplasms with unknown preoperative grades, tumor size >15 mm was considered appropriate. Conclusions: NF-spNENs are heterogeneous with varying levels of malignancy. Therefore, treatment strategies based on tumor size alone can be unreliable; personalized treatment strategies that consider tumor grading are preferable.
AB - Background & Aims: Despite previously reported treatment strategies for nonfunctioning small (≤20 mm) pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs), uncertainties persist. We aimed to evaluate the surgically resected cases of nonfunctioning small pNENs (NF-spNENs) in a large Japanese cohort to elucidate an optimal treatment strategy for NF-spNENs. Methods: In this Japanese multicenter study, data were retrospectively collected from patients who underwent pancreatectomy between January 1996 and December 2019, were pathologically diagnosed with pNEN, and were treated according to the World Health Organization 2019 classification. Overall, 1490 patients met the eligibility criteria, and 1014 were included in the analysis cohort. Results: In the analysis cohort, 606 patients (59.8%) had NF-spNENs, with 82% classified as grade 1 (NET-G1) and 18% as grade 2 (NET-G2) or higher. The incidence of lymph node metastasis (N1) by grade was significantly higher in NET-G2 (G1: 3.1% vs G2: 15.0%). Independent factors contributing to N1 were NET-G2 or higher and tumor diameter ≥15 mm. The predictive ability of tumor size for N1 was high. Independent factors contributing to recurrence included multiple lesions, NET-G2 or higher, tumor diameter ≥15 mm, and N1. However, the independent factor contributing to survival was tumor grade (NET-G2 or higher). The appropriate timing for surgical resection of NET-G1 and NET-G2 or higher was when tumors were >20 and >10 mm, respectively. For neoplasms with unknown preoperative grades, tumor size >15 mm was considered appropriate. Conclusions: NF-spNENs are heterogeneous with varying levels of malignancy. Therefore, treatment strategies based on tumor size alone can be unreliable; personalized treatment strategies that consider tumor grading are preferable.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193250738&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85193250738&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.03.029
DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.03.029
M3 - Article
C2 - 38615727
AN - SCOPUS:85193250738
SN - 1542-3565
VL - 22
SP - 1416-1426.e5
JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
IS - 7
ER -