TY - JOUR
T1 - Factors associated with quality of life in patients receiving palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases
T2 - A secondary cross-sectional analysis of data from a prospective multicenter observational study
AU - Saito, Tetsuo
AU - Shikama, Naoto
AU - Takahashi, Takeo
AU - Harada, Hideyuki
AU - Ueno, Shuichi
AU - Notsu, Akifumi
AU - Shirato, Hiroki
AU - Yamada, Kazunari
AU - Uezono, Haruka
AU - Koide, Yutaro
AU - Kubota, Hikaru
AU - Yamasaki, Takuya
AU - Ito, Kei
AU - Heianna, Joichi
AU - Okada, Yukinori
AU - Tonari, Ayako
AU - Katoh, Norio
AU - Wada, Hitoshi
AU - Ejima, Yasuo
AU - Yoshida, Kayo
AU - Kosugi, Takashi
AU - Takahashi, Shigeo
AU - Komiyama, Takafumi
AU - Uchida, Nobue
AU - Miwa, Misako
AU - Watanabe, Miho
AU - Nagakura, Hisayasu
AU - Ikeda, Hiroko
AU - Asakawa, Isao
AU - Shigematsu, Naoyuki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, British Institute of Radiology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Objective To identify factors significantly associated with quality of life (QOL) and determine if these associations are strong enough to predict certain aspects of QOL without measuring them. Methods We conducted an exploratory secondary analysis of baseline data of 224 patients (enrolled between December 2020 and March 2021) from a previously published prospective observational study on radiotherapy for bone metastases at 26 centres. Using univariable linear regression, we assessed the association between patient/treatment factors and QOL scale scores as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL Questionnaire Core 15-Palliative (QLQ-C15- PAL) and the EORTC QOL Questionnaire Bone Metastases module (QLQ-BM22). Results Age and sex were not significantly associated with QOL. Worse performance status, higher pain scores, and opioid and single-fraction use were significantly associated with most QOL scales; these four factors were associated with worse global QOL, worse functioning status, and more severe symptoms. The coefficients of determination for most QOL scales were less than 0.2, indicating that most of the variability in QOL scores was not explained by any of the explanatory variables. Conclusion Performance status, pain intensity, and opioid and single-fraction use were significantly associated with most QOL scales. However, the associations were not strong enough to estimate QOL. Advances in knowledge To date, the association between treatment factors and QOL in patients with bone metastases has not been fully studied. We identified the factors that were significantly associated with QOL and found that these associations were not strong enough to predict QOL.
AB - Objective To identify factors significantly associated with quality of life (QOL) and determine if these associations are strong enough to predict certain aspects of QOL without measuring them. Methods We conducted an exploratory secondary analysis of baseline data of 224 patients (enrolled between December 2020 and March 2021) from a previously published prospective observational study on radiotherapy for bone metastases at 26 centres. Using univariable linear regression, we assessed the association between patient/treatment factors and QOL scale scores as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL Questionnaire Core 15-Palliative (QLQ-C15- PAL) and the EORTC QOL Questionnaire Bone Metastases module (QLQ-BM22). Results Age and sex were not significantly associated with QOL. Worse performance status, higher pain scores, and opioid and single-fraction use were significantly associated with most QOL scales; these four factors were associated with worse global QOL, worse functioning status, and more severe symptoms. The coefficients of determination for most QOL scales were less than 0.2, indicating that most of the variability in QOL scores was not explained by any of the explanatory variables. Conclusion Performance status, pain intensity, and opioid and single-fraction use were significantly associated with most QOL scales. However, the associations were not strong enough to estimate QOL. Advances in knowledge To date, the association between treatment factors and QOL in patients with bone metastases has not been fully studied. We identified the factors that were significantly associated with QOL and found that these associations were not strong enough to predict QOL.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85175357629
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85175357629#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1259/bjr.20230351
DO - 10.1259/bjr.20230351
M3 - Article
C2 - 37750858
AN - SCOPUS:85175357629
SN - 0007-1285
VL - 96
JO - British Journal of Radiology
JF - British Journal of Radiology
IS - 1151
M1 - 20230351
ER -