TY - JOUR
T1 - Feasibility of robotic-assisted surgery in advanced rectal cancer
T2 - a multicentre prospective phase II study (VITRUVIANO trial)
AU - Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
AU - Hamabe, Atsushi
AU - Takemasa, Ichiro
AU - Kotake, Masanori
AU - Nakano, Daisuke
AU - Hasegawa, Suguru
AU - Shiomi, Akio
AU - Numata, Masakatsu
AU - Sakamoto, Kazuhiro
AU - Kimura, Kei
AU - Hanai, Tsunekazu
AU - Naitoh, Takeshi
AU - Fukunaga, Yosuke
AU - Kinugasa, Yusuke
AU - Watanabe, Jun
AU - Kawamura, Junichiro
AU - Ozawa, Mayumi
AU - Okabayashi, Koji
AU - Matoba, Shuichiro
AU - Takano, Yoshinao
AU - Uemura, Mamoru
AU - Kanemitsu, Yukihide
AU - Sakai, Yoshiharu
AU - Watanabe, Masahiko
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd.
PY - 2024/6/1
Y1 - 2024/6/1
N2 - Background: The potential benefits of robotic-assisted compared with laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced cancer have not been sufficiently proven by prospective studies. One factor is speculated to be the lack of strict surgeon criteria. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes for robotic surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with strict surgeon experience criteria. Methods: A criterion was set requiring surgeons to have performed more than 40 robotically assisted operations for rectal cancer. Between March 2020 and May 2022, patients with rectal cancer (distance from the anal verge of 12 cm or less, cT2–T4a, cN0–N3, cM0, or cT1–T4a, cN1–N3, cM0) were registered. The primary endpoint was the rate positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) from the pathological specimen. Secondary endpoints were surgical outcomes, pathological results, postoperative complications, and longterm outcomes. Results: Of the 321 registered patients, 303 were analysed, excluding 18 that were ineligible. At diagnosis: stage I (n = 68), stage II (n = 84) and stage III (n = 151). Neoadjuvant therapy was used in 56 patients. There were no conversions to open surgery. The median console time to rectal resection was 170 min, and the median blood loss was 5 ml. Fourteen patients had a positive CRM (4.6%). Grade III-IV postoperative complications were observed in 13 patients (4.3%). Conclusion: Robotic-assisted surgery is feasible for locally advanced rectal cancer when strict surgeon criteria are used.
AB - Background: The potential benefits of robotic-assisted compared with laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced cancer have not been sufficiently proven by prospective studies. One factor is speculated to be the lack of strict surgeon criteria. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes for robotic surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with strict surgeon experience criteria. Methods: A criterion was set requiring surgeons to have performed more than 40 robotically assisted operations for rectal cancer. Between March 2020 and May 2022, patients with rectal cancer (distance from the anal verge of 12 cm or less, cT2–T4a, cN0–N3, cM0, or cT1–T4a, cN1–N3, cM0) were registered. The primary endpoint was the rate positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) from the pathological specimen. Secondary endpoints were surgical outcomes, pathological results, postoperative complications, and longterm outcomes. Results: Of the 321 registered patients, 303 were analysed, excluding 18 that were ineligible. At diagnosis: stage I (n = 68), stage II (n = 84) and stage III (n = 151). Neoadjuvant therapy was used in 56 patients. There were no conversions to open surgery. The median console time to rectal resection was 170 min, and the median blood loss was 5 ml. Fourteen patients had a positive CRM (4.6%). Grade III-IV postoperative complications were observed in 13 patients (4.3%). Conclusion: Robotic-assisted surgery is feasible for locally advanced rectal cancer when strict surgeon criteria are used.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196957585&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85196957585&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae048
DO - 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae048
M3 - Article
C2 - 38913419
AN - SCOPUS:85196957585
SN - 2474-9842
VL - 8
JO - BJS open
JF - BJS open
IS - 3
M1 - zrae048
ER -