TY - JOUR
T1 - Fecal incontinence and oral regurgitation during duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection using the water pressure method
AU - Takada, Yoshihisa
AU - Hirose, Takashi
AU - Nishida, Kazuki
AU - Kakushima, Naomi
AU - Furukawa, Kazuhiro
AU - Furune, Satoshi
AU - Ishikawa, Eri
AU - Sawada, Tsunaki
AU - Maeda, Keiko
AU - Yamamura, Takeshi
AU - Ishikawa, Takuya
AU - Ohno, Eizaburo
AU - Nakamura, Masanao
AU - Honda, Takashi
AU - Ishigami, Masatoshi
AU - Kawashima, Hiroki
AU - Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Objectives: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the duodenum is challenging. The water pressure method (WP-ESD) has been developed with a decreased rate of perforation. However, details of perioperative adverse events of WP-ESD are unknown. The purpose of this study was to clarify the frequency and related factors of fecal incontinence and oral regurgitation during WP-ESD. Methods: A chart-based retrospective analysis was performed on 43 patients who underwent duodenal WP-ESD. The saline volume given into the body was calculated in all cases. All adverse events during WP-ESD until 6 weeks were extracted, and factors related to intraoperative fecal incontinence or oral regurgitation were analyzed. The frequency of fecal incontinence and oral regurgitation was also compared to those of 83 conventional ESD cases. Results: In WP-ESD, intraoperative fecal incontinence occurred in 12 (28%), oral regurgitation in six (14%), and aspiration pneumonia in one patient. For fecal incontinence, the infusion speed (saline volume divided by resection time) around 17 mL/min was a significant factor in multivariable analysis. For oral regurgitation, only tumor size was a significant factor in univariate analysis (P = 0.027). Significant difference was observed in the frequency of fecal incontinence between WP-ESD and conventional ESD (28% vs. 0%, P < 0.001), but no difference was observed in oral regurgitation or aspiration pneumonia. Conclusions: Intraoperative fecal incontinence is a unique adverse event of WP-ESD related to the infusion speed. WP-ESD did not pose a risk for oral regurgitation, but we should be aware of the risk in large tumor cases.
AB - Objectives: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the duodenum is challenging. The water pressure method (WP-ESD) has been developed with a decreased rate of perforation. However, details of perioperative adverse events of WP-ESD are unknown. The purpose of this study was to clarify the frequency and related factors of fecal incontinence and oral regurgitation during WP-ESD. Methods: A chart-based retrospective analysis was performed on 43 patients who underwent duodenal WP-ESD. The saline volume given into the body was calculated in all cases. All adverse events during WP-ESD until 6 weeks were extracted, and factors related to intraoperative fecal incontinence or oral regurgitation were analyzed. The frequency of fecal incontinence and oral regurgitation was also compared to those of 83 conventional ESD cases. Results: In WP-ESD, intraoperative fecal incontinence occurred in 12 (28%), oral regurgitation in six (14%), and aspiration pneumonia in one patient. For fecal incontinence, the infusion speed (saline volume divided by resection time) around 17 mL/min was a significant factor in multivariable analysis. For oral regurgitation, only tumor size was a significant factor in univariate analysis (P = 0.027). Significant difference was observed in the frequency of fecal incontinence between WP-ESD and conventional ESD (28% vs. 0%, P < 0.001), but no difference was observed in oral regurgitation or aspiration pneumonia. Conclusions: Intraoperative fecal incontinence is a unique adverse event of WP-ESD related to the infusion speed. WP-ESD did not pose a risk for oral regurgitation, but we should be aware of the risk in large tumor cases.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110155240&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85110155240&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/den.14070
DO - 10.1111/den.14070
M3 - Article
C2 - 34185924
AN - SCOPUS:85110155240
SN - 0915-5635
VL - 34
SP - 526
EP - 534
JO - Digestive Endoscopy
JF - Digestive Endoscopy
IS - 3
ER -