TY - JOUR
T1 - Fertility-sparing surgery and oncologic outcome among patients with early-stage ovarian cancer ∼propensity score- matched analysis∼
AU - Kajiyama, Hiroaki
AU - Suzuki, Shiro
AU - Yoshikawa, Nobuhisa
AU - Kawai, Michiyasu
AU - Mizuno, Kimio
AU - Yamamuro, Osamu
AU - Nagasaka, Tetsuro
AU - Shibata, Kiyosumi
AU - Kikkawa, Fumitaka
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s).
PY - 2019/12/19
Y1 - 2019/12/19
N2 - Background: The aim of this study was to investigate how much the risks of recurrence and death are increased as a consequence of selecting fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in young women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods: After a central pathological review and search of the medical records from 14 collaborating hospitals, a non-randomized, observational cohort study was conducted between 1987 and 2015, including 1183 women with stage I EOC. Finally, a total of 285 patients with stage I EOC at reproductive age were recruited. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the FSS (N = 101) and radical surgery (RS) group (N = 184) using a propensity score (PS)-matching technique to adjust for relevant risk factors: the age, substage, histological type, grade, CA125 values, ascites cytology, ascites volume, and chemotherapy. Results: During 66.0 months (median) of follow-up, 42 patients (14.7%) developed recurrence, and 31 patients (10.9%) died. In the original cohort, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the FSS and RS groups {Log-rank: OS (P = 0.838), RFS (P = 0.377)}. In the PS-matched cohort after adjustment for multiple clinicopathologic factors, there was no significant difference in RFS or OS between the FSS and RS groups {RFS (FSS vs. RS), HR: 1.262 (95% CI: 0.559-2.852), P = 0. 575; OS (FSS vs. RS), HR: 1.206 (95% CI: 0.460-3.163), P = 0.704}. Conclusions: After adjustment for clinicopathologic factors, FSS in itself may not worsen the oncologic outcome in young women with early-stage EOC. A large-scale clinical study is necessary to validate the findings.
AB - Background: The aim of this study was to investigate how much the risks of recurrence and death are increased as a consequence of selecting fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in young women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Methods: After a central pathological review and search of the medical records from 14 collaborating hospitals, a non-randomized, observational cohort study was conducted between 1987 and 2015, including 1183 women with stage I EOC. Finally, a total of 285 patients with stage I EOC at reproductive age were recruited. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the FSS (N = 101) and radical surgery (RS) group (N = 184) using a propensity score (PS)-matching technique to adjust for relevant risk factors: the age, substage, histological type, grade, CA125 values, ascites cytology, ascites volume, and chemotherapy. Results: During 66.0 months (median) of follow-up, 42 patients (14.7%) developed recurrence, and 31 patients (10.9%) died. In the original cohort, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the FSS and RS groups {Log-rank: OS (P = 0.838), RFS (P = 0.377)}. In the PS-matched cohort after adjustment for multiple clinicopathologic factors, there was no significant difference in RFS or OS between the FSS and RS groups {RFS (FSS vs. RS), HR: 1.262 (95% CI: 0.559-2.852), P = 0. 575; OS (FSS vs. RS), HR: 1.206 (95% CI: 0.460-3.163), P = 0.704}. Conclusions: After adjustment for clinicopathologic factors, FSS in itself may not worsen the oncologic outcome in young women with early-stage EOC. A large-scale clinical study is necessary to validate the findings.
KW - Epithelial ovarian carcinoma
KW - Fertility-sparing surgery
KW - Overall survival
KW - Propensity score
KW - Recurrence
KW - Recurrence-free survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077136089&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85077136089&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12885-019-6432-4
DO - 10.1186/s12885-019-6432-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 31856753
AN - SCOPUS:85077136089
SN - 1471-2407
VL - 19
JO - BMC Cancer
JF - BMC Cancer
IS - 1
M1 - 1235
ER -